1963
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(63)90004-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual optics in the cat, including posterior nodal distance and retinal landmarks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a proxy of visual acuity or visual resolution) using eye size and retinal ganglion cell density (Hughes, 1977). First, we multiplied eye axial length by 0.60 (following Hughes, 1977;Martin, 1993) as an estimate of posterior nodal distance (PND; length from the posterior nodal point of the eye to the photoreceptor layer; Vakkur et al, 1963). We then calculated the retinal magnification factor (RMF, the linear distance on the retina subtending 1 deg of visual space; Pettigrew et al, 1988) by using the following equation: RMF=2πPND/360.…”
Section: Eye Size Retinal Ganglion Cell Density and Visual Acuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a proxy of visual acuity or visual resolution) using eye size and retinal ganglion cell density (Hughes, 1977). First, we multiplied eye axial length by 0.60 (following Hughes, 1977;Martin, 1993) as an estimate of posterior nodal distance (PND; length from the posterior nodal point of the eye to the photoreceptor layer; Vakkur et al, 1963). We then calculated the retinal magnification factor (RMF, the linear distance on the retina subtending 1 deg of visual space; Pettigrew et al, 1988) by using the following equation: RMF=2πPND/360.…”
Section: Eye Size Retinal Ganglion Cell Density and Visual Acuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optic disk of each eye was periodically projected onto the visual display with a reversible ophthalmoscope and its position was recorded. We used these measurements to estimate receptive field locations with respect to the area centralis (Vakkur et al, 1963;Nikara et al, 1968;Milleret et al, 1988).…”
Section: Physiological Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the schematic eye derived for the cat by Vakkur and Bishop (1963) and Vakkur, Bishop, and Kozak (1963), it is clear that the cat possesses a relatively large eyeball with a broadly curved cornea, a disproportionately large pupil and a globular shaped lens situated rather deep posteriorly within the eye. These structural adaptations endow the eat's eye with a great light-gathering capacity, and it is estimated that for a given object intensity, retinal illumination is 5.2 times greater in the cat than in the human (Vakkur & Bishop, 1963).…”
Section: Opticsmentioning
confidence: 99%