2006
DOI: 10.1080/02841860500468950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual outcome, local tumour control, and eye preservation after106Ru/Rh brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the consecutive series of patients after Ru106 brachytherapy, patients retained some useful vision in the first postoperative years and a few even got better visual acuity; however, the long-term visual outcome is poor with a continuing visual acuity loss over time. A large number of patients became blind or lost reading ability after 5 years, either because of radiation complications or secondary enucleation (35). According to our results, tumor regression after the single SRS treatment at a 6-month interval in the first year after the therapy showed that in the group of small tumors in all of the cases there was no increase of the elevation; in 24 months, there was tumor regression in 3 cases (75%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the consecutive series of patients after Ru106 brachytherapy, patients retained some useful vision in the first postoperative years and a few even got better visual acuity; however, the long-term visual outcome is poor with a continuing visual acuity loss over time. A large number of patients became blind or lost reading ability after 5 years, either because of radiation complications or secondary enucleation (35). According to our results, tumor regression after the single SRS treatment at a 6-month interval in the first year after the therapy showed that in the group of small tumors in all of the cases there was no increase of the elevation; in 24 months, there was tumor regression in 3 cases (75%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In the consecutive series of patients after Ru106 brachytherapy, patients retained some useful vision in the first postoperative years and a few even got better visual acuity; however, the long-term visual outcome is poor with a continuing visual acuity loss over time. A large number of patients became blind or lost reading ability after 5 years, either because of radiation complications or secondary enucleation (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the specific underlying causes remain not fully understood, and radiation-induced visual acuity deterioration might originate from several discrete pathophysiologies. Isager et al investigated visual outcomes for 55 patients, and found tumour height and the largest base dimension as the most important risk factors for visual acuity deterioration, but they did not perform multivariate analyses, nor did they include dose in their analysis [12]. According to Bergman et al, initial visual acuity was main risk factor along with the distance from the tumour to the fovea in a study with 579 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are very similar to ours. Some authors reported 5-year eye preservation rates of 72-82% [ 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%