2002
DOI: 10.1038/415609a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual predators select for crypticity and polymorphism in virtual prey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
219
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
219
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Common morphs thereafter suffer from more intensive male-mating harassment, causing both their fitness and future frequency to decline (Fincke 2004). This latter mechanism is thus a form of apostatic selection, similar to the frequencydependent visual mechanism that causes the fitness of common prey to decline, due to the development among predators of search images towards common prey morphs Kamil 1998, Bond andKamil 2002). Evidence for apostatic selection in terms of frequencydependent female fecundities comes from our longitudinal study of four generations, involving a dozen populations .…”
Section: Sexually Antagonistic Selection and Female Polymorphismmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Common morphs thereafter suffer from more intensive male-mating harassment, causing both their fitness and future frequency to decline (Fincke 2004). This latter mechanism is thus a form of apostatic selection, similar to the frequencydependent visual mechanism that causes the fitness of common prey to decline, due to the development among predators of search images towards common prey morphs Kamil 1998, Bond andKamil 2002). Evidence for apostatic selection in terms of frequencydependent female fecundities comes from our longitudinal study of four generations, involving a dozen populations .…”
Section: Sexually Antagonistic Selection and Female Polymorphismmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Future work might address whether disruptive patterning allows its carrier to exploit a greater range of habitats than an organism with only background matching, and whether search images for disruptively patterned prey can be developed by predators. A computer-based system such as the one employed here not only enables close control over the foraging environment, but it also potentially allows camouflage solutions to evolve when subjected to selection (see also Bond & Kamil 2002, 2006Sherratt et al 2007). If disruptive pattern solutions were introduced to this general approach, then we would have a unique set of tools for designing and identifying effective camouflage strategies in a wide range of contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Search image formation is thought to result from limited attention in predators; it can generate frequency-dependent predation and maintain polymorphism, as shown in experiments using artificial prey 27,28 . If selective predation were responsible for the frequency-dependent survival we observed, our results suggest that predators were attuned to small elements of colour patterns, as we manipulated the frequency of only a small part of the overall pattern.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%