2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-020-04707-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Preference for Biological Motion in Children and Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Eye-Tracking Study

Abstract: Participants with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (n = 121, mean [SD] age: 14.6 [8.0] years) and typically developing (TD) controls (n = 40, 16.4 [13.3] years) were presented with a series of videos representing biological motion on one side of a computer monitor screen and non-biological motion on the other, while their eye movements were recorded. As predicted, participants with ASD spent less overall time looking at presented stimuli than TD participants (P < 10–3) and showed less preference for biologica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These atypical fixations are thought to reflect atypical social attention, a leading hypothesis in autism research [ 31 , 32 ]. Another robust finding is that autistic infants have a reduced preference for biological motion stimuli [ 4 , 33 35 ]. Other theories propose atypical attention to visual stimuli that involve other people’s direction of eye gaze [ 36 ], prediction [ 37 ], geometric patterns [ 38 ], local versus global processing [ 39 ], or imitation engagement [ 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These atypical fixations are thought to reflect atypical social attention, a leading hypothesis in autism research [ 31 , 32 ]. Another robust finding is that autistic infants have a reduced preference for biological motion stimuli [ 4 , 33 35 ]. Other theories propose atypical attention to visual stimuli that involve other people’s direction of eye gaze [ 36 ], prediction [ 37 ], geometric patterns [ 38 ], local versus global processing [ 39 ], or imitation engagement [ 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less time spent on biological motion, faces and eyes have indeed been classically reported (e.g. 4,5,12 , but see 13 ), with a less systematical visual exploration pattern 14 . Moreover, when social and non-social contents are presented simultaneously, autistic participants show a preference for non-social stimuli 15,16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“… Hirai and Senju (2020) have proposed an integrative hypothesis of the two-process theory, wherein the “step detector” responsible for the local motions of feet below the body precedes the “bodily action evaluator” that processes the global processing of action types and styles. Several studies in both human adults and children have suggested the association between reduced sensitivity to BM and ASD ( Blake et al, 2003 ; Rutherford et al, 2006 ; Wang et al, 2018 ; Kaliukhovich et al, 2021 ) [also see the recent meta-analysis ( Federici et al, 2020 )]. Importantly, it should be noted that, in our current context, visual preferences for social stimuli (face inversion, averted eye gaze, and BM) markedly differ between the two groups of infants with high and low familial risk of autism ( Di Giorgio et al, 2016a ).…”
Section: Surface Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%