2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual preferences for physical attributes of mining and post-mining landscapes with respect to the sociodemographic characteristics of respondents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
78
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
10
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specialists in technical fields, on the other hand, are more focused on the development and implementation of technology, and they often disregard or underrate landscape values. This statement may seem ideologically based, but the results of our study and many others [28,29,31,35] have demonstrated considerable differences in landscape perceptions between respondents from technical fields and respondents from environmental fields. Such perceptions and opinions may be shaped by the personality of each individual, even before he or she registers as a student.…”
Section: Importance Of Educational Orientation For Plannersmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specialists in technical fields, on the other hand, are more focused on the development and implementation of technology, and they often disregard or underrate landscape values. This statement may seem ideologically based, but the results of our study and many others [28,29,31,35] have demonstrated considerable differences in landscape perceptions between respondents from technical fields and respondents from environmental fields. Such perceptions and opinions may be shaped by the personality of each individual, even before he or she registers as a student.…”
Section: Importance Of Educational Orientation For Plannersmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…To date, however, there has been no study examining the possible influence of the type of university education and subsequent professional development on the perception of WTs as new technological structures in the landscape. This situation is analogous to the perception of post-mining areas, where the way in which respondents with a professional focus on landscape ecology perceive post-mining landscapes differs markedly from the perceptions of respondents of other orientations [29]. Another study testing the opinion of university students on the placement waste dumps demonstrates that the differing perceptions of respondents are influenced by their level of environmental knowledge [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A study by Svobodova et al (2012) may provide an explanation for this apparent contradiction. The authors found that the presence of a water feature in an evaluated landscape is the main reason for the public's higher visual preferences.…”
Section: Proximity To Water Features and Other Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the European context, these photographs are often taken from vantage points, which are usually visited on foot. It is the underlying context of many European studies (Fyhri et al, 2009;Svobodova et al, 2012) and landscape assessment methodologies (Swanwick and Land use Consultants, 2002;Vorel et al, 2003) that people mostly appreciate the visual quality of a landscape while walking through it or engaging in other outdoor activities. In comparison, Nassauer (1989) notes: "the rural landscape is the primary setting for the most popular recreational activity, driving for pleasure" -in the North American context.…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Aesthetic Perception Of Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%