1997
DOI: 10.1006/jvlc.1996.0030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Programming Languages and the Empirical Evidence For and Against

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
66
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Whitley provides a corresponding overview [74]. The arguments brought forth by Larkin and Simon emphasize the strength of visual representations [31], which is partially supported by Mayer [35] and Roth [61].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whitley provides a corresponding overview [74]. The arguments brought forth by Larkin and Simon emphasize the strength of visual representations [31], which is partially supported by Mayer [35] and Roth [61].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whitley [20] found that visual notations have potential for making information explicit and providing better organisation, which may help with program design, problem-solving and performance, even more so as the size of problems increases. However, there is still a lack of evidence that they are generally easier to learn, understand, use and share [2] and in addition it appears that the benefits of a notation are relative to a particular application area (task [8]).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the interpretation of business process descriptions in BPMN (graphical notation) and in an alternative text notation (based on written use-cases) was investigated in [19]. More generally, [20] provides an overview of relative strengthes and weaknesses of textual versus flowchart notations. For this investigation, we have focused on the declarative modeling language Declare.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%