2007
DOI: 10.1159/000110023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Rating and ROI-Based Parametric Analysis of rCBF SPECT in Patients with Mild or Questionable Dementia: A Comparative Study

Abstract: Background: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of visual image rating as compared to parametric analysis of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) measured with SPECT in patients referred to a memory clinic for diagnostic evaluation of cognitive symptoms. Methods: SPECT with 99mTc-HMPAO was used to determine rCBF in 47 patients and 26 healthy control subjects. The 47 patients (30 F/17 M) had a mean age of 74.6 years (range = 62–88) and mild or questionable dementia with an MMSE score of 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of interest, a dichotomous visual interpretation of CIS (present or absent) had a higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the quantitative CIS ratio in distinguishing DLB patients from AD patients [21]. However, there are no established visual criteria for the degree of CIS, even though visual rating of other imaging biomarkers and modalities are commonly used and has proven to be a fast, reliable and reproducible method in clinical practice [14,36,37]. The application of a standardized method to classify and interpret the presence of CIS may enhance the utilization of relevant diagnostic information, along with improving the diagnostic accuracy of DLB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of interest, a dichotomous visual interpretation of CIS (present or absent) had a higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the quantitative CIS ratio in distinguishing DLB patients from AD patients [21]. However, there are no established visual criteria for the degree of CIS, even though visual rating of other imaging biomarkers and modalities are commonly used and has proven to be a fast, reliable and reproducible method in clinical practice [14,36,37]. The application of a standardized method to classify and interpret the presence of CIS may enhance the utilization of relevant diagnostic information, along with improving the diagnostic accuracy of DLB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of visual SPECT ratings to predict AD in patients with MCI has not been evaluated in longitudinal studies (Table 1), even though SPECT visual diagnostic reads are commonly used for this purpose. In a cross-sectional study of patients with MCI and comparison subjects, Hogh (17) reported an overall accuracy rate of 89% in comparing dichotomous visual versus ROI ratings of SPECT abnormality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AD prediction with a higher accuracy may be achieved, although typically in well established disease and when neuropsychological and clinical assessments are also taken into consideration, which can be over a decade behind the detectable structural MRI changes [31]. In general, volumetric measures and visual rating have each been used evaluating neuroimaging, particular MRI, although inter-study variations exist with either technique [3235]. Consistent with previous studies, our data showed a medium-high predictive value with the use of MTAS [4,28,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%