2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00766-013-0194-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual requirements analytics: a framework and case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, this work offers numerous opportunities for research that combines NLP and information visualization in RE; for another example of such synergy, see our work on terminological ambiguity [6]. In order for automated techniques to become useful for practitioners, the results of automation have to be turned into requirements analytics tools [26] that are built for use by human analysts.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, this work offers numerous opportunities for research that combines NLP and information visualization in RE; for another example of such synergy, see our work on terminological ambiguity [6]. In order for automated techniques to become useful for practitioners, the results of automation have to be turned into requirements analytics tools [26] that are built for use by human analysts.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual Requirements Analytics. Reddivari et al [26] proposed a framework that characterizes the visual requirements analytics process. They argue that, when proposing a requirements visualization, one has to explicitly define many aspects: the user, the goal, the questions to be answered, how to preprocess data, and the visualization type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, we plan to employ other analysis techniques for Bayesian Networks, such as sensitivity analysis (van der Gaag et al 2007) or qualitative reasoning (Wellman 1990). Visualization tools, which are missing in this paper, are necessary to support human analysts in visualizing the validity of the assumptions in a requirements model, as discussed in Reddivari et al (2014), and to help them in deciding about the manual evolution of an STS. A starting point could be the visualization we developed in earlier work (Dell'Anna et al 2018a).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An up-to-date literature review of the existing visual requirements analytics 7 frameworks can be found in Reddivari et al [5] and Cooper et al [6]. Coatanéa et al [7] and Lash [8] extract requirements and relationships from unstructured specifications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the supply chain, a stakeholder is either a system integrator 4 or an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) 5 . Nonetheless, any stakeholder at tier N can, in turn, be an integrator of OEMs' subsystems developed at tier N-1, and an OEM that provides a subsystem to an integrator at tier N+1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%