2003
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.

Abstract: Four pop-out search experiments investigated whether dimension-based visual attention is top-down modulable. Observers searched for singleton feature targets defined, variably across trials, by a color or an orientation difference to nontargets. Observers were precued to the most probable target-defining dimension (e.g., by the word color) or feature (red) on a given trial. Results revealed expedited reaction times (RTs) for valid-dimension targets relative to neutral-cue conditions, and slowed RTs for invalid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

45
329
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(381 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
45
329
7
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be noted, however, that in the Müller et al (2003) study mentioned above, the cost of a dimension switch, although reduced by a cue, was not eliminated even with a generous 1550 ms CSI.…”
Section: Other Evidence For Attentional Inertiamentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may be noted, however, that in the Müller et al (2003) study mentioned above, the cost of a dimension switch, although reduced by a cue, was not eliminated even with a generous 1550 ms CSI.…”
Section: Other Evidence For Attentional Inertiamentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For example, modest dimension-switching costs are seen in visual search for a single-feature singleton when the target changes between colour and shape singletons, and these costs are attenuated -but not eliminated -by verbally cuing the dimension of the target (Müller, Reimann, & Krummenacher, 2003). It is widely agreed that the detection of targets defined by specified features (Wolfe & Horowitz, 2004), dimensions (Krummenacher & Müller, 2012), objects, and even categories of object (Nako, Wu & Eimer, 2014) can be proritized through top-down control.…”
Section: Other Evidence For Attentional Inertiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, Müller et al (2003) used a trial-by-trial dimensionalcueing procedure. Before each trial, a verbal cue (the words color and shape) indicated the likely target-defining dimension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that the cue allows participants to actively prepare themselves for the likely upcoming stimulus dimension. In terms of the dimensional-weighting account (Müller et al, 2003), or guided search (e.g., Wolfe et al, 2003), it is assumed that participants use the advance cue to allocate attentional weight to the likely target dimension. In Experiments 3 and 4, we used the same trial-by-trial procedure as did Müller et al (2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation