2008
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.012963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual sensitivity to a conspicuous male cue varies by reproductive state inPhysalaemus pustulosusfemales

Abstract: SUMMARYThe vocal sac is a visually conspicuous attribute of most male frogs, but its role in visual communication has only been demonstrated recently in diurnally displaying frogs. Here we characterized the spectral properties of the inflated vocal sac of male túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus), a nocturnal species, and túngara visual sensitivity to this cue across reproductive state and sex. We measured the spectral and total reflectance of different male body regions, including inflated and non-inflated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with their life history, as they hide in root systems, grasses and debris during daylight hours when visual cues are present Stamper et al, 2010). Similarly, other nocturnal or crepuscular animals that can rely on non-visual sensory information for the control of behavior also preferentially rely on visual cues when they are present (Knudsen and Knudsen, 1989;Penteriani et al, 2007;Cummings et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This is consistent with their life history, as they hide in root systems, grasses and debris during daylight hours when visual cues are present Stamper et al, 2010). Similarly, other nocturnal or crepuscular animals that can rely on non-visual sensory information for the control of behavior also preferentially rely on visual cues when they are present (Knudsen and Knudsen, 1989;Penteriani et al, 2007;Cummings et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This is similar to the downwelling irradiance at a typical nocturnal breeding site (Cummings et al, 2008). We observed frogs using an infrared viewer.…”
Section: General Proceduressupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The photon flux density received on the Earth from our moon is estimated to be 0.5 nmol photon m −2 s −1 (Munz and McFarland 1973), 3 nmol photon m −2 s −1 (Salisbury 1981) and 5 nmol photon m −2 s −1 (Gorbunov and Falkowski 2002). Subsequent estimates are 3 nmol photon m −2 s −1 (Johnsen et al 2006) and 12 nmol photon m −2 s −1 (Cummings et al 2008). The mean of these values is less than the absolute minimum for photolithotrophic growth by O 2 -evolving organisms (10 nmol photon m −2 s −1 ), so that even the full moon on a cloudless night could not support photosynthetic growth of organisms.…”
Section: Photosynthesis Induced By Moonlightmentioning
confidence: 84%