Visual suppression of monocularly presented symbology against a fused background in a simulation and training environment

Abstract

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY)2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From -To) SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)AFRL; AFRL/HEA SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S)Air DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTESThis paper was originally published in SPIE Vol. 6224, Helmet-and Head-mounted Displays XI (July 2006). ABSTRACTWhen wearing a monocular head-mounted display (HMD), one eye views the HMD symbology while both eyes view an out-the-window scene. This may create interocular differences in image characteristics that could disrupt binocular vision by provoking visual suppression, thus reducing visibility of the background scene, monocular symbology, or both. However, binocular fusion of the background scene may mitigate against the occurrence of visual suppression, a hypothesis that was investigated in the present study. Observers simultaneously viewed a static background scene and HMD symbology while performing a target recognition task under several viewing conditions. In a simulated HMD condition observers binocularly viewed a background scene with monocular symbology superimposed. In another condition, viewing was dichoptic (i.e. completely different images were presented to the left and right eyes). Additionally, one control condition was implemented for comparison. The results indicate that for continuously presented targets binocular rivalry did not have significant effects on target visibility. However, for briefly presented targets, binocular rivalry was shown to increase thresholds for target recognition time in HMD and dichoptic viewing conditions relative to the control. Impairment was less in the HMD condition. Thus, binocular fusion of a background scene can partially mitigate against the occurrence of visual suppression. However, some suppression still exists which occurs between monocular pathways. Implications for the integration of monocular HMDs into Air Force training environments will be discussed. SUBJECT TERMS ABSTRACTWhen wearing a monocular head-mounted display (HMD), one eye ...

Visibility of monocular symbology in transparent head-mounted display applications

“…We have shown previously that visibility was reduced for a monocularly viewed alphanumeric character under partial fusion conditions similar to those we will describe here, but only with static imagery and at a fixed contrast. 28 In the present study, we examine the effect of motion (flight over terrain) and target contrast on the visibility of monocularly viewed symbology. …”

P‐31: Selective Attention Effects on Binocular Rivalry to Simple and Complex Dynamic Imagery

“…It should be noted that our study included simple BR conditions with one rivalrous stimulus to each eye, while in operational aircraft the graphical information is often presented to one eye only while both view, and binocularly fuse, the same out-the-window scene. It is known that BR is less under these latter conditions [22].…”

Performance and comfort of monocular head-mounted displays in flight simulators

“…It may be that eye-dominance and rivalry do not play a significant role in performance until viewing conditions are more degraded. Previous research 13 showed that for low contrast monocular targets presented briefly, performance was degraded when compared to binocularly viewed targets. Further, this effect has been shown to disappear when target contrast is increased from 10% to 40% 14 .…”