Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages
DOI: 10.1109/wvl.1992.275769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual tools for generating iconic programming environments

Abstract: We present VAMPIRE, a visual system for rapid generation of iconic programming systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Escalante does not explicitly provide support for defining the execution of the visual languages. VAMPIRE 7 is another system that has emphasis on the dynamic language semantics but not on general user inteface construction. EDGE 8 is a generic graph editor for automatic graph layout, graph abstraction and extensibility using an OO approach.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Escalante does not explicitly provide support for defining the execution of the visual languages. VAMPIRE 7 is another system that has emphasis on the dynamic language semantics but not on general user inteface construction. EDGE 8 is a generic graph editor for automatic graph layout, graph abstraction and extensibility using an OO approach.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both BitPict and ChemTrains have no included abilities to augment graphical rules with textual predicates. The Vampire system overcomes this limitation with attributed graphical rules (McIntyre & Glinert, 1992).…”
Section: Programming With Graphical Rewrite Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However some of these languages are true icon-based programming systems that limit the amount of text-based programming required. Research on iconic programming languages began over 20 years ago (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18) but it made little change in the way the majority of programmers program today. This is mainly blamed on scalability (19,46): icon-based programming was fine for small sized programs but for commercial sized software with large scale architecture and much more complex logic, the iconic programs became too difficult to understand and work with: program readability was the limiting issue (20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%