2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2010.5539821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual tracking decomposition

Abstract: We propose a novel tracking algorithm that can work robustly in a challenging scenario such that several kinds of appearance and motion changes of an object occur at the same time. Our algorithm is based on a visual tracking decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
686
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,038 publications
(688 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
686
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Animal, Shaking and Soccer sequences are provided in [28] and the Box and Jumping are from [29]. The 7 trackers we compare with are the fragment tracker (Frag) [30], the online AdaBoost method (OAB) [5], the Semi-supervised tracker (SemiB) [7], the MILTrack algorithm [8], the 1 -tracker [10], the TLD tracker [11], and the Struck method [31].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Animal, Shaking and Soccer sequences are provided in [28] and the Box and Jumping are from [29]. The 7 trackers we compare with are the fragment tracker (Frag) [30], the online AdaBoost method (OAB) [5], the Semi-supervised tracker (SemiB) [7], the MILTrack algorithm [8], the 1 -tracker [10], the TLD tracker [11], and the Struck method [31].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, IVT is less effective in handling heavy occlusion or non-rigid distortion. Kwon et al [9] extend the classic particle filter framework with multiple dynamic observation models to account for appearance and motion variation. Nevertheless, due to the adopted generative representation scheme, this tracker is not equipped to distinguish between the target and its local background.…”
Section: The Generative Trackersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are based on either templates [5,6,8,9,12] or subspace models [7,10,11]. Popular generative trackers include eigentracker [5], mean shift tracker [6], fragment-based tracker [7], incremental tracker (IVT) [8], and visual tracking decomposition (VTD) tracker [9]. Black and Jepson [5] learn a subspace model offline to represent target at predefined views and build on the optical flow framework for tracking.…”
Section: The Generative Trackersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations