2013
DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqt053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual workflow interfaces for editorial processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It aims to support and improve the document editing and publication process. Designed by Milena Radzikowska and programmed by Luciano Frizzera, it is derived from the flowchart of activities that an editor can use to manage the movement of a submitted article or other item of text through the stages from acquisition to publication (Frizzera et al 2013). We worked also with Workflow Orlando Edition, a customization for the document writing and markup process in The Orlando Project, an online cultural history of women's writers in the British Isles.…”
Section: Workflow Editorial and Orlando Edition: Generative Feedback ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It aims to support and improve the document editing and publication process. Designed by Milena Radzikowska and programmed by Luciano Frizzera, it is derived from the flowchart of activities that an editor can use to manage the movement of a submitted article or other item of text through the stages from acquisition to publication (Frizzera et al 2013). We worked also with Workflow Orlando Edition, a customization for the document writing and markup process in The Orlando Project, an online cultural history of women's writers in the British Isles.…”
Section: Workflow Editorial and Orlando Edition: Generative Feedback ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e INKE Interface Design team has been developing a visual interface to handle workflows for such processes as journal editing or the collaborative production of digital scholarship, and an earlier project pioneered the representation of credit for contributions to wiki texts (Arazy, Stroulia, Ruecker, Arias, Fiorentino, Ganev, & Yau, 2010;Frizzera, Radzikowska, Roeder, Peña, Dobson, Ruecker, Rockwell, Brown, et al, 2013). Yet aside from the context of textual editing, focused attention on problems of versioning is still rare within the context of humanities infrastructure and tool development, even as we turn for interoperability in the direction of linked data approaches that intensify the challenges of versioning.…”
Section: Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%