2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualization of active biomass distribution in a BGAC fluidized bed reactor using GFP tagged Pseudomonas putida F1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The biofilm thicknesses are similar to those found by Hwang et al (22) for OSPW biofilms produced on polyethylene (PE) and polyvinylchloride (PVC) coupons in continuous bioreactors, where a continuous (full covered) biofilm on the surface was observed on these relatively smooth surfaces. This is expected, as the bacteria form a complex structure of aerobic biofilms formed by discrete aggregates of densely packed cells and interstitial voids on the GAC surfaces as reported previously (38,39). The ozonated OSPW treatment showed faster initial attachment of bacteria (by day 18), despite having a biofilm thickness similar to that of raw OSPW after 48 days.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The biofilm thicknesses are similar to those found by Hwang et al (22) for OSPW biofilms produced on polyethylene (PE) and polyvinylchloride (PVC) coupons in continuous bioreactors, where a continuous (full covered) biofilm on the surface was observed on these relatively smooth surfaces. This is expected, as the bacteria form a complex structure of aerobic biofilms formed by discrete aggregates of densely packed cells and interstitial voids on the GAC surfaces as reported previously (38,39). The ozonated OSPW treatment showed faster initial attachment of bacteria (by day 18), despite having a biofilm thickness similar to that of raw OSPW after 48 days.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The GAC biofilm thicknesses were greater than the previously observed biofilm thickness (34 Ϯ 5 m) for the treatment of OSPW using fluidized bed biofilm reactors (15,16). The greater biofilm thickness on the GAC from the current study might be attributed to a reduction in biofilm detachment from the lower shear stress in the batch reactors compared with that in the fluidized bed biofilm reactors (39,41).…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…A specific form of activated carbon, granular activated carbon (GAC), consists of irregularly shaped particles having a porous structure which can both absorb (into microorganism biofilm) and adsorb (directly) many chemical compounds. The porous structure can protect microorganisms from potentially high fluid shear forces, thus promoting microbial colonization which can lead to biodegradation (Herzberg et al 2006). In addition, GAC has a high adsorption capacity, due to a large specific surface area, which increases the availability of organic substrates and nutrients to microorganisms at the media surface and, subsequently enhances biodegradation efficiency (Herzberg et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porous structure can protect microorganisms from potentially high fluid shear forces, thus promoting microbial colonization which can lead to biodegradation (Herzberg et al 2006). In addition, GAC has a high adsorption capacity, due to a large specific surface area, which increases the availability of organic substrates and nutrients to microorganisms at the media surface and, subsequently enhances biodegradation efficiency (Herzberg et al 2006). The ability of GAC to be bioregenerated in biofilm reactors acts to enhance organics removal well beyond only the adsorption capacity which would normally be exhausted and need to be regenerated in the absence of this bioregeneration (Aktas and Cecen 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) was used as a marker on a phenol degrading bacterium, Pseudomonas putida F1, to monitor biofilm growth (Herzberg et al, 2006). Quantitative analysis of the biofilm, by using COMSTAT image-processing software, showed higher biomass concentration and higher viability in the granular activated carbon (GAC) covered biofilm vs. the non-activated carbon biofilm.…”
Section: Time Of Flight-secondary Ion Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%