1980
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualization of microtubules of cells in situ by indirect immunofluorescence.

Abstract: Microtubule staining patterns can be visualized within cells in situ on the surface of fish scales from the squirrel fish, Holocentrus ascensionis, and the common goldfish, Carassius auratus, after incubation with antibodies to sea urchin tubulin and fluorescein-labeled goat antibodies to rabbit immunoglobulin G. Chromatophores in situ from both species reveal a radial microtubule framework that orients the alignment of pigment granules.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These data also support the growing information indicating that the presence of microfilament bundles in vitro may not be an artifact of cells grown in culture. Recently, Byers and Fujiwara 119821 and Rogers and Kalnins 119831 have demonstrated quite elegantly the presence of microfilament bundles or stress fibers in certain cells in situ; microtubules [Byers et al, 1980;Rogers and Kalnins, 19831 and intermediate filaments [Blose and Meltzer, 19811 have recently been documented also in situ. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that in the periodontal ligament in vivo, many fibroblast-like cells are highly elongated, exhibit an abundance of oriented microtubules and microfilaments, and both adhaerens-type and gap junctions [Beertsen et al, 1974;Garant and Cho, 1979;Shore and Berkowitz, 1979;Beertsen and Everts, 19801.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data also support the growing information indicating that the presence of microfilament bundles in vitro may not be an artifact of cells grown in culture. Recently, Byers and Fujiwara 119821 and Rogers and Kalnins 119831 have demonstrated quite elegantly the presence of microfilament bundles or stress fibers in certain cells in situ; microtubules [Byers et al, 1980;Rogers and Kalnins, 19831 and intermediate filaments [Blose and Meltzer, 19811 have recently been documented also in situ. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that in the periodontal ligament in vivo, many fibroblast-like cells are highly elongated, exhibit an abundance of oriented microtubules and microfilaments, and both adhaerens-type and gap junctions [Beertsen et al, 1974;Garant and Cho, 1979;Shore and Berkowitz, 1979;Beertsen and Everts, 19801.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absorbed antigen and the immunological reagent for each disk are: disk 1, fish skeletal muscle actin and absorbed IgG (0.37 mg/ml) ; disk 2, fish skeletal muscle actin and absorbed IgG (0.037 mg/ml) ; disk 3, fish skeletal muscle actin and antiactin (0.25 mg/ml) ; disk 4, fish skeletal muscle actin and antiactin (0.10 mg/ml) ; disk 5, fish skeletal muscle actin and antiactin (0.01 mg/ml) ; disk 6, human platelet actin and antiactin (0.25 mg/ ml) ; disk 7, chicken gizzard tropomyosin and antiactin (0 .25 mg/ ml) . Disks [3][4][5][6] show reaction products, while disks 1, 2, and 7 do not. The antiactin made against fish skeletal muscle actin crossreacts with human platelet actin (disk 6) .…”
Section: Characterization and Purification Of The Antiactin Antiseramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect immunofluorescence procedures (6) were carried out on different scales with the following antibodies : affinity-purified antiactin (50 lag/ml), a 1 :20 dilution of serum containing antimyosin, and a 1 :20 dilution of anti-alpha-actinin serum .…”
Section: Preparation and Staining Of Cells In Situmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When stained with antibodies to tubulin and viewed in situ, the microtubules are seen to extend out radially from the cells' organizing centers, and then curve abruptly to become aligned with the collagenous fibers of the underlying scale. It is impressive that microtubules in adjacent cells are similar in number, all oriented in the same manner, and all share a nearly identical pattern (Byers et al, 1980). It seems highly unlikely that the centrosome alone can induce changes in the direction of microtubule growth from a distance of many micrometers without the aid of other organizing components situated in peripheral cytoplasm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%