2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10948-021-05826-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualization of the Field Penetration at the Shielding Current Break and Its Restoration in the Pulse Magnetized YBCO Ring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 7 we plot the time dependence of the trapped field in the ring bulk at 73 K after applying magnetizing pulses with different rise times. When the IGBT was in the default state only a small amount of flux could penetrate into the sample for an applied field of 2.40 T. More flux could be forced to penetrate into the sample by increasing the applied field, but this would also increase the amount of heating and might trigger a flux jump, leading to a lower final trapped field (and possibly a negative trapped field if the circulating magnetizing current is broken) [18,19]. As shown in Figure 7, when the IGBT was in the default state for an applied field of 2.44 T, the peak field in the bore of the sample was 2.23 T, which is very close to the applied field, suggesting there was very little shielding current in the bulk superconducting ring.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 7 we plot the time dependence of the trapped field in the ring bulk at 73 K after applying magnetizing pulses with different rise times. When the IGBT was in the default state only a small amount of flux could penetrate into the sample for an applied field of 2.40 T. More flux could be forced to penetrate into the sample by increasing the applied field, but this would also increase the amount of heating and might trigger a flux jump, leading to a lower final trapped field (and possibly a negative trapped field if the circulating magnetizing current is broken) [18,19]. As shown in Figure 7, when the IGBT was in the default state for an applied field of 2.44 T, the peak field in the bore of the sample was 2.23 T, which is very close to the applied field, suggesting there was very little shielding current in the bulk superconducting ring.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 2.19 T applied field, the field at the inner surface then rapidly increases to 2.5 T at a time t = 37.5 ms. The measured central field at this time exceeds the applied field, indicating that the circulating supercurrent has been broken within the ring [47], causing the ring essentially to act as a magnetic lens for the applied field [48,49]. As the flux density measured at H1 has not similarly increased, the flux penetration has occurred elsewhere within the ring due to the non-uniformity of the critical current density throughout the sample [50]thus the probed axis is not likely to be the weakest region of the ring [51].…”
Section: Measuring Flux Propagation Into a Bulk Superconducting Ring ...mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Applied fields higher than 3 T triggered large flux jumps resulting in a small negative trapped field. This is likely due to breaking of the circulating supercurrent because of the large heating generated due to flux jumps [12]. For disc bulks, flux jumps during PFM can greatly enhance the trapped field and magnetization efficiency as flux jumps could lead to magnetic flux suddenly penetrating into the centre of the disc bulks [21].…”
Section: A Single-pulse Pfm Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heating problem is worse in the case of bulk superconducting rings during PFM because the magnetic flux penetrates from both the inner and outer edges of the sample [9], [10]. This can result in significant heating [11], causing the magnetization current to be disrupted and the trapped field to reduce significantly [12], [13]. As a result, it has been very challenging to magnetize bulk superconducting rings with high trapped fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%