2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualization of Transvection in Living Drosophila Embryos

Abstract: How remote enhancers interact with appropriate target genes persists as a central mystery in gene regulation. Here, we exploit the properties of transvection to explore enhancer-promoter communication between homologous chromosomes in living Drosophila embryos. We successfully visualized the activation of an MS2-tagged reporter gene by a defined developmental enhancer located in trans on the other homolog. This trans-homolog activation depends on insulator DNAs, which increase the stability-but not the frequen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

20
157
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
20
157
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using previously published ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq data , we found no association between pairing and any of the DNA-binding insulator proteins (BEAF, Su(Hw), CTCF, and GAF)( Fig. 4A-D), suggesting that complex combinations of bound insulators, rather than individual proteins, might contribute to homologous pairing or stabilize interactions between already paired TADs (Lim et al, 2018). Intriguingly, both Cp190 and Mod(mdg4), insulator co-factors that do not directly bind to DNA, were associated with pairing ( Fig.…”
Section: Examining the Relationship Between Pairing Chromatin Factormentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Using previously published ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq data , we found no association between pairing and any of the DNA-binding insulator proteins (BEAF, Su(Hw), CTCF, and GAF)( Fig. 4A-D), suggesting that complex combinations of bound insulators, rather than individual proteins, might contribute to homologous pairing or stabilize interactions between already paired TADs (Lim et al, 2018). Intriguingly, both Cp190 and Mod(mdg4), insulator co-factors that do not directly bind to DNA, were associated with pairing ( Fig.…”
Section: Examining the Relationship Between Pairing Chromatin Factormentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Enhancers can be situated far away from the genes they regulate 1,4 . Although not always the case 5,6 , at many gene loci proximity between enhancers and promoters is thought to be essential for enhancer function and gene activation 7,8 . How these enhancer-promoter interactions are initiated and maintained is not clearly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One consequence of this is that factors modulating the levels of transcription can do so by changing either the frequency with which a burst occurs (measured by the gap between bursts) or the size of each burst (measured by changes in burst duration and/or amplitude). Since forced looping of the beta-globin enhancer to its promoter led to an increase in burst frequency (Bartman et al 2016), it has been proposed that transcription factors activate transcription by modulating enhancer-promoter interactions, and hence bursting frequency; although other studies suggest enhancer-promoter interactions are not the underlying basis of transcriptional bursting (Lim et al 2018;Chen et al 2018). Though the molecular origin of bursting remains unknown, bursting frequency rather than burst duration or amplitudes seems to be the major parameter modulated in different species and contexts (So et al 2011;Senecal et al 2014;Xu et al 2015;Desponds et al 2016;Padovan-Merhar et al 2015;Lammers et al 2018;Berrocal et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%