2015
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.115.009517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing Acute Stroke Data to Improve Clinical Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Real-time feedback of time metrics to the stroke team members is essential to improve the quality of acute stroke care (19). However, the feedback process is time-consuming, and many institutions avoid it when possible (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-time feedback of time metrics to the stroke team members is essential to improve the quality of acute stroke care (19). However, the feedback process is time-consuming, and many institutions avoid it when possible (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Workflow and imaging data were analyzed weekly and frequent feedback provided to all sites through Web-based teleconferences. 5 The trial collected data on multiple events in the workflow from stroke symptom onset to reperfusion including time of stroke symptom onset, arrival in the emergency department of the endovascularcapable hospital, baseline imaging, randomization, intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (alteplase) administration, randomization, groin puncture, and reperfusion. Among patients who were referred to the endovascular-capable hospital from another hospital, data were collected on whether intravenous alteplase was administered before arrival in the emergency department of the endovascular-capable hospital (drip and ship) or after qualifying CT at the endovascularcapable hospital.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visualisation of data can also prompt the discovery of new information within it, which may result in changes to practice and improved educational and clinical outcomes (Gill et al 2015;Vaitsis et al 2014). The benefits of better understanding data can apply at both individual and population levels (Kamal et al 2015;Schneiderman et al 2013) and are as relevant to review articles as primary research (Bravata et al 2007). Recent work by four of the authors used novel visualisation of data to make systematic review findings more clearly understood (Figure 1).…”
Section: Tip 10: 'Consider the Choice Of Evidence Synthesis Carefully'mentioning
confidence: 99%