2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9469-4_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing and Quantifying In Vivo Cortical Cytoskeleton Structure and Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stills of the actin and microtubule networks in epidermal pavement cells were taken by a Zeiss LSM880 microscope with a Plan-Apochromat 40 x/1.2 W objective and 488-nm argon laser for excitation, videos were taken by an inverted spinning disc confocal microscope (Yokogawa CSU-X1 on a Nikon Ti-E platform, laser box Agilent MLC400, camera Andor Ixon) with 100 x/1,45 O plan apochromatic objective, excitation laser line set at 488 nm, and image interval 1 s as described previously (Rosero et al, 2016). Cytoskeleton bundling and density were quantified as described previously (Higaki et al, 2010) with minor modifications (Rosero et al, 2013;Rosero et al, 2019).…”
Section: Cytoskeleton Structure and Dynamics Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stills of the actin and microtubule networks in epidermal pavement cells were taken by a Zeiss LSM880 microscope with a Plan-Apochromat 40 x/1.2 W objective and 488-nm argon laser for excitation, videos were taken by an inverted spinning disc confocal microscope (Yokogawa CSU-X1 on a Nikon Ti-E platform, laser box Agilent MLC400, camera Andor Ixon) with 100 x/1,45 O plan apochromatic objective, excitation laser line set at 488 nm, and image interval 1 s as described previously (Rosero et al, 2016). Cytoskeleton bundling and density were quantified as described previously (Higaki et al, 2010) with minor modifications (Rosero et al, 2013;Rosero et al, 2019).…”
Section: Cytoskeleton Structure and Dynamics Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%