2019
DOI: 10.3791/60225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing Astrocyte Morphology Using Lucifer Yellow Iontophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the NGV circuit, the number of perivascular processes was constrained for juvenile rodents at 2 ± 1 processes. These numbers are in accordance with literature measurements (Calì et al, 2019;Moye et al, 2019). Furthermore, the number of primary processes in the NGV was measured as 8 ± 1 processes ( Figure 7 M).…”
Section: Data Validation: Population-levelsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the NGV circuit, the number of perivascular processes was constrained for juvenile rodents at 2 ± 1 processes. These numbers are in accordance with literature measurements (Calì et al, 2019;Moye et al, 2019). Furthermore, the number of primary processes in the NGV was measured as 8 ± 1 processes ( Figure 7 M).…”
Section: Data Validation: Population-levelsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To establish the connectivity between astrocytes and the vasculature, we first distributed potential targets on the vasculature skeleton graph with a frequency of 0.17 μm -1 (McCaslin et al, 2011) and then determined which fraction of the resulting point cloud was included in each microdomain boundary polygon. Based on literature data, each astrocyte was assigned a number of endfeet, ranging from 1 to 5 (Moye et al, 2019) and the endfeet sites were sequentially selected according to the following observations and experimental astrocyte reconstructions: endfeet processes minimize their distance to the vascular site (Kacem et al, 1998), maximize the distance to nearby endfeet sites and target different branches (Calì et al, 2019).…”
Section: Reconstructing the Ngv Connectomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same caveat applies for GFAP, the most widely used structural astrocyte marker, and for the newest small‐molecule astrocyte markers, like the cationic‐pyridinium family of markers (Preston et al., 2018; Preston, Cervasio, & Laughlin, 2019). The majority of structural astrocyte analyses are performed using GFAP exclusively (SheikhBahaei et al., 2018; Viola et al., 2009) or injectable intracellular fluorescent dyes (Butt & Ransom, 1989; Moye, Diaz‐Castro, Gangwani, & Khakh, 2019). GFAP is found in primary, secondary, and some tertiary astrocyte branches, but not in higher‐order processes, excluding significant portions of the astrocyte from analysis.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond use of Lck-GFP, other studies have utilized astrocyte reporter mouse lines or fluorescent dyes to label and identify astrocytes in greater detail than afforded by GFAP IHC (Morel et al, 2017(Morel et al, , 2019Moye et al, 2019). Moreover, a companion article provided in this same issue (see Current Protocols article; Badia-Soteras, Octeau, Verheijen, & Khakh, 2020) details use of live-cell fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to quantify proximal interactions between neurons and astrocytes (Octeau et al, 2018).…”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%