2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing energy consumption activities as a tool for making everyday life more sustainable

Abstract: social context) they are performed. We discuss the importance of relating information and feedback to households' everyday activities, in order to make it relevant to households. Through our method we discover and visualize activity patterns in a household during a given period. The method is also useful to households as a reflective tool when discussing families' daily lives in relation to energy consumption. The method gives direct feedback to households and the information is relevant since it emanates from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many of the survey participants owned multiple appliances and demonstrated high levels of appliance use and demonstrated high levels of appliance use, with obvious implications for electricity consumption. This is supported by Ellegard and Palm, who argue that increasing environmental awareness and knowledge of energy saving may not be sufficient on its own to reduce energy consumption in households [61]. One reason for this is the rapid growth in ownership of household appliances and poor levels of understanding amongst residents of how much energy each of these devices consume, even amongst those who are knowledgeable about energy and environmental issues [61].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, many of the survey participants owned multiple appliances and demonstrated high levels of appliance use and demonstrated high levels of appliance use, with obvious implications for electricity consumption. This is supported by Ellegard and Palm, who argue that increasing environmental awareness and knowledge of energy saving may not be sufficient on its own to reduce energy consumption in households [61]. One reason for this is the rapid growth in ownership of household appliances and poor levels of understanding amongst residents of how much energy each of these devices consume, even amongst those who are knowledgeable about energy and environmental issues [61].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The evaluation of DR potential must be based on the knowledge of end-uses. A first approach, presented in the literature to investigate energy conservation potential, is to obtain activity patterns of customers, at the aggregate level, to identify customer activities (the so called "functional model" defined in [17]), for instance, customers requesting high amounts of energy and thus might have a significantly potential market for efficiency [34]. An alternative is the use ICT and NILM technologies, see for example [15].…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Customers: End-usesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different variations on Equation (10) can be found in the literature [56,57] but they present some problems. For example: they do not consider some constraints in end-use flexibility due to electrical or service characteristics irrespective of energy price (it is not possible to switch-off or reduce demand for all the loads, for instance in the case of non-dimmable lights or washing machines, i.e., a change on switching times is possible but not a modulation of demand); load patterns or service requirements are not the same throughout the day (see Figure 3, or references [15,34]); some loads need a certain recovery period (to restore steady state service after control or to recover production schedule in the case of the industrial segment but this process is usually misunderstand and oversimplified [25,27]); the customer can apply some response previous to price peak periods but not during all the periods (for example precooling or preheating options are effective but only in periods near to peak-price response periods, i.e., E ik do not exists for none or many time periods); or the fact that changes in demand, due to substitution elasticity, involve an additional use of energy (i.e., thermal losses due to the switching of WH from service periods to 8-10 h before use). For these reasons, it seems more accurate (and complex) to apply a model for the evaluation of demand changes on each specific end-use (eu), D PDR k,eu linked with PBLM models that gives some feedback to model.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Pdr: An Economic Model To Evaluate the Size Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations