2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing harm reduction: Methodological and ethical considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Publications incorporating photovoice methods have typically been descriptive, with most lacking an assessment on the comparative advantages and limitations of the process, and ways of dealing with these ( Castleden et al, 2008 , Drew and Guillemin, 2014 , Evans-Agnew and Rosemberg, 2016 , Harley, 2012 , Pilcher et al, 2015 , Prins, 2010 , Switzer et al, 2015 ). Among the few studies that have considered these issues, Harley, 2012 , Packard, 2008 and Prins (2010) critically discussed some ethical dilemmas experienced using the photovoice methods including: (i) balancing the power dynamics between researchers and participants; (ii) barriers to participants’ involvement, particularly with vulnerable people (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Publications incorporating photovoice methods have typically been descriptive, with most lacking an assessment on the comparative advantages and limitations of the process, and ways of dealing with these ( Castleden et al, 2008 , Drew and Guillemin, 2014 , Evans-Agnew and Rosemberg, 2016 , Harley, 2012 , Pilcher et al, 2015 , Prins, 2010 , Switzer et al, 2015 ). Among the few studies that have considered these issues, Harley, 2012 , Packard, 2008 and Prins (2010) critically discussed some ethical dilemmas experienced using the photovoice methods including: (i) balancing the power dynamics between researchers and participants; (ii) barriers to participants’ involvement, particularly with vulnerable people (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metaphor may have also allowed participants to attend to ethical issues. While participants were permitted to photograph others (with consent), stigma and issues of disclosure pose unique ethical issues for HIV-related visual research, as documented extensively elsewhere (Schrader, Deering, Zahl, & Wallace, 2011;Switzer et al, 2015;Teti, Murray, Johnson, & Binson, 2012). Workshop 5 concluded with participants looking across their photos to identify common similarities and differences within their sites.…”
Section: Discussion and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally used in anthropology and sociology, the PEI is increasingly used in health research [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ] and among vulnerable populations [ 15 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no PEI study published to date focused specifically on the issue of persons in PVS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid the study being an additional cause of stress or misunderstanding, we chose not to ask the participants to take photographs of their loved ones in PVS. In addition, a photo-elicitation study complicates the traditional definition of confidentiality and consent [ 18 , 27 , 26 ]. If the family members were asked to take photographs, they might take pictures of people or patients not concerned by the study, which would require an additional consent process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%