2007
DOI: 10.1177/1525822x06298589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing Personal Networks: Working with Participant-aided Sociograms

Abstract: We describe an interview-based data-collection procedure for social network analysis designed to aid gathering information about the people known by a respondent and reduce problems with data integrity and respondent burden. This procedure, a participant-aided network diagram (sociogram), is an extension of traditional name generators. Although such a diagram can be produced through computer-assisted programs for interviewing (CAPIs) and low technology (i.e., paper), we demonstrate both practical and methodolo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
256
1
13

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 279 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
256
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The total number of very close and somewhat close ties is used as the measure for social network size. On average, the respondents have a network size of 27.17 alters, which is comparable to other studies that used the same name generators (Hogan et al 2007; Van den Berg et al 2009). The share of relatives is the percentage of direct and other relatives in the total social network (as opposed to colleagues or fellow students, club or association members, neighbors and other friends).…”
Section: Data Collection and Descriptive Statisticssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total number of very close and somewhat close ties is used as the measure for social network size. On average, the respondents have a network size of 27.17 alters, which is comparable to other studies that used the same name generators (Hogan et al 2007; Van den Berg et al 2009). The share of relatives is the percentage of direct and other relatives in the total social network (as opposed to colleagues or fellow students, club or association members, neighbors and other friends).…”
Section: Data Collection and Descriptive Statisticssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This can be explained by time constraints, assuming that the presence of children implies more maintenance activities and thus less time for club activities (Hogan et al 2007). …”
Section: Effects Of Explanatory Variables On Travel Frequency To Assomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One re-entering worker declined participation in the study because she did not want to share her experience about the return-to-work process. During the interview the re-entering worker was asked to fill in a sociogram [28]. The sociogram used was pictured as a dart board with the re-entering worker in the centre.…”
Section: Data Sample and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The re-entering worker was then contacted by telephone, and if they gave their consent, a time and date was set for an interview. During the interview with the re-entering worker, a sociogram [24] was filled out to further develop the purposive sample [21]. The sociogram provided a graphic description of social relations between the re-entering worker and the co-workers, in terms of closeness in work tasks.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%