1995
DOI: 10.1016/0263-7855(94)00010-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing properties of atomic and molecular systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the major benefits of using the Fukui functions instead of the frontier orbitals − Equations (3a-3c) instead of Equations (4a-4c) − is that Fukui functions include the effects of orbital relaxation, which is very important. [42][43][44] …”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One of the major benefits of using the Fukui functions instead of the frontier orbitals − Equations (3a-3c) instead of Equations (4a-4c) − is that Fukui functions include the effects of orbital relaxation, which is very important. [42][43][44] …”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Only one ab initio calculation is needed and obviously the resulting molecular Fukui function is always positive definite. There seem to be only a few cases in the literature where orbital relaxation effects are so important that frontier orbital fails, [57][58][59][60] so basing one's analysis on FMO theory is usually justified. The neglect of electron correlation in FMO theory is believed to be less significant, though there have been no systematic studies.…”
Section: Frontier Molecular Orbital Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaussian 09 [21] is used to perform energy and geometry optimizations for every molecular system with each functional and CCSD. To compare each DFT functional for the different molecular systems, the STM [22] modules of the visualization tool AVS/Express [23] are used to visually subtract the ground state charge density computed by each functional from that of CCSD. The energy convergence for the optimization step, performed for the CC calculations, is on the order of 10 -8 Hartrees which is more accurate than the charge density differences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%