2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9591524.0366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing the effects of scopolamine in the rat brain using functional MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That study concluded that the effects of scopolamine are probably mainly due to vascular responses. Another study, however, showed that butyl-scopolamine did not induce brain activation changes measured with fMRI (Cash et al, 2005). Differences between these studies include anesthesia protocols i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…That study concluded that the effects of scopolamine are probably mainly due to vascular responses. Another study, however, showed that butyl-scopolamine did not induce brain activation changes measured with fMRI (Cash et al, 2005). Differences between these studies include anesthesia protocols i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…One of the limitations of the SCO model is its peripheral side-effects that can influence the learning and memory deficits at higher doses of SCO 4 . In a preclinical pharmaco-MRI study the 1 mg/kg SCO and BSCO performed similarly in isoflurane anesthesia 14 , while in α-chloralose anesthesia the 0.8 mg/kg SCO increased the BOLD contrast in the frontal cortex but the same dose of BSCO, not 15 . Importantly, in an eminent translational study of the SCO model, 0.3 mg/kg dose of SCO was used, in rats 6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, in α-chloralose anesthesia in a similar preclinical pharmaco-MRI study, increased BOLD contrast in the frontal (orbital) cortex and olfactory nuclei were found after the i.v. injection of SCO while it was absent after BSCO 15 . These diverging results highlight the difficulty of interpreting preclinical pharmaco-MRI data 16 complicated by the use of different anesthetic regimes 17 , 18 that can introduce potential confounds 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, in α-chloralose anesthesia in a similar preclinical pharmaco-MRI study, the SCO i.v. injection increased the BOLD contrast in the frontal (orbital) cortex and olfactory nuclei while it was absent after BSCO injection [11]. These diverging results highlight the difficulty interpreting preclinical pharmaco-MRI data [12] complicated by the use of different anesthetic regimes [13] that can introduce potential confounds [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%