2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visually estimated left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiography is closely correlated with formal quantitative methods

Abstract: This finding is in concordance with prior studies, indicating thateyeballing-EF eyeballing ejection fraction may be the most accurate echocardiographic method for the assessment of LV left ventricular systolic function. Since it is readily and quickly performed, eyeballing-EF eyeballing ejection fraction could be used for routine echocardiography instead of formal methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
101
0
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
101
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…A normal rat heart FS% is greater than 40, and FS% is greater than 30 in healthy humans (Gudmundsson et al 2005;Regitz-Zagrosek et al 2007;He et al 2009;Soetikno et al 2012;Allen et al 2013). In this study, FS% in the aged rat hearts was 26.77 %, and FS% in the other groups increased from 36.11 to 43.11 % (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…A normal rat heart FS% is greater than 40, and FS% is greater than 30 in healthy humans (Gudmundsson et al 2005;Regitz-Zagrosek et al 2007;He et al 2009;Soetikno et al 2012;Allen et al 2013). In this study, FS% in the aged rat hearts was 26.77 %, and FS% in the other groups increased from 36.11 to 43.11 % (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Most quantitative two dimensional echocardiographic measurements of ventricular performance are based on geometric assumptions that apply only to the LV but do not apply to the RV [2]. RV trabeculations are coarse compared to the finely trabeculated LV [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,25,26 There are multiple quantitative modalities for LVEF calculation; however, qualitative estimates of ejection fraction by EP FOCUS correlate well with both quantitative measurements and subjective estimates by cardiologists. 25,27 Qualitative assessment of global ejection is typically categorized as "hyperdynamic" (LVEF > 65%), "normal" (LVEF 50% to 65%), "moderately depressed" (LVEF 30% to 50%), or "severely depressed" (LVEF < 30%). 25,28 Additionally, in cardiac arrest patients, one can recognize "no coordinated myocardial activity" as a likely indicator of futility of further resuscitation.…”
Section: Ejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%