1991
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.105.1.176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visuomotor relearning after brain damage crucially depends on the integrity of the ventrolateral thalamic nucleus.

Abstract: The role of the ventrolateral thalamic nucleus (VL) has been analyzed in the phase of motor recovery that takes place when the execution of a previously learned movement has been perturbed by damage to another brain area. Cats were trained to perform a reaching movement toward a moving target-spot; they underwent bilateral brain lesions after performance had stabilized. A VL lesion induced a very transient increase of reaction time. The lesion of the main thalamic relay of the visual extrageniculate pathway (L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, the extension of the thalamic lesion from VL only to VL and VA does not simply induce a more severe deficit and a more restricted recovery, it also results in a modification of the impairment features themselves suggesting that the cerebral circuits that take over motor control are different, depending on the thalamic lesion. Finally, these results will be discussed in relation with previous suggestions concerning the possible role of thalamo-cortical messages in motor learning and relearning (Fabre-Thorpe, 1992; Fabre-Thorpe & Levesque, 1991b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Secondly, the extension of the thalamic lesion from VL only to VL and VA does not simply induce a more severe deficit and a more restricted recovery, it also results in a modification of the impairment features themselves suggesting that the cerebral circuits that take over motor control are different, depending on the thalamic lesion. Finally, these results will be discussed in relation with previous suggestions concerning the possible role of thalamo-cortical messages in motor learning and relearning (Fabre-Thorpe, 1992; Fabre-Thorpe & Levesque, 1991b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The ventral lateral nucleus receives projections from the cerebellum and connects reciprocally with the basal ganglia, motor cortex, and premotor cortices to form a sensorimotor network that drives the acquisition and implementation of learned motor behaviors (6769). Smaller regional volumes in the ventral lateral nucleus could therefore contribute to the gross and fine motor disturbances and the slower processing speed that have been documented in children with ADHD (7074).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, lesions of the thalamus can be effective for relieving tremor but are not effective for relieving other symptoms such as bradykinesia and akinesia. In fact, lesions, even very large ones, of cerebellar-receiving regions of the thalamus have little effect on limb movements in monkeys, cats, and humans (Canavan et al 1989 ; Fabre-Thorpe and Levesque 1991 ; Bastian and Thach 1995 ; Duval et al 2006 ). Still, lesions of the lateral cerebellum including the lateral nucleus produce severe movement deficits (Botterell 1938 ; Carpenter and Stevens 1957 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a problem with movement pathways involving thalamic nuclei: Lesions in the thalamus that interrupt projections to the motor cortex can relieve tremors associated with PD or cerebellar disease but have little effect on other motor symptoms such as akinesia and bradykinesia (Marsden and Obeso 1994 ; Duval et al 2006 ). Additionally, animal experiments show that limb movements, which are severely disturbed by basal ganglia diseases or cerebellar damage, remain relatively normal after large thalamic lesions (Canavan et al 1989 ; Fabre-Thorpe and Levesque 1991 ) or temporary inactivation of the thalamus (van Donkelaar et al 2000 ). Therefore, basal ganglia output must be able to influence movement via pathways that do not pass through the thalamus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%