2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.03.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visuospatial information processing load and the ratio between parietal cue and target P3 amplitudes in the Attentional Network Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ANT version adapted for children was used (Kratz et al, 2011; Abramov et al, 2017). It was performed by an inhouse software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ANT version adapted for children was used (Kratz et al, 2011; Abramov et al, 2017). It was performed by an inhouse software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, P3 wave reflects the temporo-parietal high-order information processing, which is under the control of frontal executive centers [53, 54]. As cue and target conditions in the present study were equiprobable, we can consider that P3 possibly reflected the allocation of information workload for target visuospatial processing [37, 53]. Therefore, the lower P3 amplitude in ADHD was possibly a result of impaired cognitive processes related to visuospatial information processing in ANT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In the ANT paradigm that was used here [31, 32, 37], there is a temporal dissociation of flank distractors and target onset at 100 ms. The temporal dissociation of the target seems to reduce the damaging effect of flank distractors on behavior, which is higher in the case of incongruence between target and distractors [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stimuli containing spatial information can elicit larger ERP amplitudes than those without. A previous study found that a stimulus located above or below the central fixation point elicited a larger P300 amplitude than one located at the central fixation point (Abramov et al, 2017). Several studies reported that when the appearance of the target was predictable, subjective efforts in perceptual processing and attention orientation were small, resulting in the reduction of the target P300 amplitude (Sutton et al, 1965;Hugdahl and Nordby, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%