Vitamin D, diet, and lifestyle in a chronic SCI population

Koutrakis, Nicholas E.; Goldstein, Rebekah L.; Walia, Palak; Polak, Madeline; Lazzari, A; Tun, Carlos G.; Hart, Jaime E.; Garshick, Eric

doi:10.1038/s41393-018-0148-1

Cited by 13 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A range of dietary intake methodologies were used with studies incorporating one dietary assessment method (n = 76, 85%) [2,[6][7][8]20,[22][23][24][25]28,29,32,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]53,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]70,94,[97][98][99][100][101][102][103]…”

Section: Dietary Assessment Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The continent most frequently studying the dietary intake of their military and veterans was North America. All North American sudies were conducted in the USA, with almost two thirds (n = 57, 64%) of included studies originating from this country [6,7,20,24,25,29,30,32,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]46,49,[51][52][53][54][55][58][59][60][62][63][64][65][66]68,74,[77][78][79][80]82,83,88,89,[91][92][93][94][95][97][98][99][100...…”

Section: Study Locationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The population types that included intervention studies were army (n = 9) [7,21,32,38,51,53,56,84,89], air force (n = 3) [36,49,54], veterans (n = 1) [103], National Guard (n = 1) [86], and Navy Marines (n = 1) [39]. The most commonly studied type of military personnel in included studies were soldiers (n = 28, 31%) [6,7,22,24,29,32,35,37,38,45,46,48,50,51,53,56,57,59,62,[70][71][72][73][74]76,88] followed by veterans (n = 14, 16%) [20,[94][95][96][97][98][99][100]…”

Section: Intervention Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most frequent methodology used in included studies was FFQs (n = 40, 45%) [2,6,20,21,37,38,41,43,44,47,51,53,56,[62][63][64][65][70][71][72][73][74][75][76]78,90,93,[96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106] ranging in length from eight to 150 items and administered from once per study up to multiple over a 17-year period. The personnel types to commonly use the FFQ for dietary intake collection were army (n = 23/40, 58%) [2,6,21,37,38,43,44,47,51,53,56,…”

Section: Food Frequency Questionnaires (Ffqs)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the 89 studies, 13 (15%) reported less than five dietary outcomes [21,36,46,48,57,59,72,84,92,95,98,106], 35 (39%) reported five to 10 [8,20,22-25,31,32,35,37,43,45,47,49,50,52-55,58,64-66,68, 73,77,78,85,86,88,89,94,101,102,104], and 41 (46%) reported more than 10 dietary outcomes, which were mostly nutrient profiles [2,6,7,[28][29][30]34,[37][38][39][40][41][42]44,51,56,[60][61][62][63][70][71][72][74][75][76][79][80][81][82][83]87,90,91,93,96,…”

Section: Dietary Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Dietary Assessment Methods in Military and Veteran Populations: A Scoping Review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Optimal dietary intake is important for the health and physical performance of military personnel. For military veterans, the complex nature of transition into civilian life and sub-optimal dietary intake is a leading contributor to the increased burden of disease. A scoping review was undertaken to determine what is known about the assessment and reporting of dietary intakes within both military and veteran populations. In addition, this review determines if studies reporting on the dietary intake of military personnel or veterans include comparisons with dietary guidelines. Six databases were searched to identify papers published from the database inception to April 2019. Observational and intervention studies were searched to identify if they assessed and reported whole dietary intake data, reported data exclusively for a military or veteran population, and included only healthy populations. A total of 89 studies were included. The majority of studies used one dietary assessment method (n = 76, 85%) with fewer using multiple methods (n = 13, 15%). The most frequent methodology used was food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) (n = 40, 45%) followed by 24-hour recalls (n = 8, 9%) and food records (n = 8, 9%). The main dietary outcomes reported were macronutrients: carbohydrate, protein, fat, and alcohol (n = 66, 74%) with total energy intake reported in n = 59 (66%). Fifty four (61%) studies reported a comparison with country-specific dietary guidelines and 14 (16%) reported a comparison with the country-specific military guidelines. In conclusion, dietary intake in military settings is most commonly assessed via FFQs and 24-hour recalls. Dietary intake reporting is mainly focused around intakes of energy and macronutrients. Most studies compare against dietary guidelines, however, comparison to specific military dietary guidelines is minimal.

show abstract