2022
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.920340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin D Effects on Selected Anti-Inflammatory and Pro-Inflammatory Markers of Obesity-Related Chronic Inflammation

Abstract: BackgroundObesity is related to changes in adipokine secretion, activity of adipose tissue macrophages, helper T cells, and regulatory T cells. It has been confirmed that vitamin D has potent anti-inflammatory properties. It contributes to reduction in pro-inflammatory mediators and an increase in anti-inflammatory cytokines. There is also evidence that vitamin D could decrease C-reactive protein (CRP) and affect selected haematological indices.Aim of the StudyWe aimed to evaluate the effect of vitamin D on in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The intervention led to significant improvements in energy and macronutrient intake, body weight, insulin sensitivity, and blood lipid profiles. These findings resonate with earlier studies demonstrating the benefits of vitamin D3 and probiotics on metabolic health [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The observed synergistic effect highlights the potential of combining these bioactive compounds in a dietary matrix.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The intervention led to significant improvements in energy and macronutrient intake, body weight, insulin sensitivity, and blood lipid profiles. These findings resonate with earlier studies demonstrating the benefits of vitamin D3 and probiotics on metabolic health [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The observed synergistic effect highlights the potential of combining these bioactive compounds in a dietary matrix.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…To address such multifaceted physiological disruptions, researchers have turned their attention to innovative dietary interventions that leverage the combined effects of bioactive substances, including vitamin D and probiotics. Vitamin D3 has emerged as a focal point in enhancing insulin sensitivity [1], modulating lipid profiles [2], and exerting anti-inflammatory effects [3], while probiotics have been recognized for their ability to modulate the gut microbiota [4], systemic inflammation [5], and lipid metabolism [6]. A recent systematic review of seven clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) underscored the synergistic benefits of vitamin D and probiotic co-supplementation (lactic acid bacteria) in ameliorating chronic disease markers and improving metabolic health more effectively than either component alone [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vitamin D supplementation increases the levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ and IL-10) in subjects with normal weight and vitamin D insufficiency [ 134 ]. While some studies have suggested that increased serum 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 concentrations are associated with decreased inflammatory marker expression in individuals with normal weight [ 135 ], other research has found no significant effects of vitamin D on inflammatory biomarkers in patients with obesity [ 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 ]. Furthermore, studies on the effect of vitamin D supplementation on CRP serum levels in patients with obesity have yielded conflicting results [ 137 , 138 , 139 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When consumption of a micronutrient falls below the current recommended dietary allowance (RDA), a significant chronic metabolic disturbance may occurs [ 23 ]. In earlier studies, micronutrients, including vitamins D and E and others, have been linked to obesity [ 24 25 26 27 ]. We observed that the mean dietary adequacy of vitamins D and E in this study was far below recommended values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%