Interest in the relationship between vitamin D and health has increased over the past decade, with concurrent increases in the number of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) assays performed and in the use of vitamin D supplements. 1,2 In 2011, the National Academy of Medicine determined that a 25(OH)D level less than 20 ng/mL (49.9 nmol/L) was consistent with deficiency and that there was no evidence for different 25(OH)D thresholds for different health conditions. 3 This recommendation resulted in vigorous debate within the medical and scientific community regarding the merits of screening for vitamin D deficiency and the goal 25(OH)D levels in healthy persons as well as those with certain chronic conditions. 4 In the 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), an estimated 25% of the US population was vitamin D deficient, with 5% of individuals 1 year or older with 25(OH)D levels less than 12 ng/mL and 18% with 25(OH)D levels between 12 and 19 ng/mL. 5 In this issue of JAMA, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) presents an updated recommendation-insufficient evidence to recommend screening for vitamin D deficiency in asymptomatic adults (an I statement)-based on a commissioned updated comprehensive evidence review. 6,7 The USPSTF last made a recommendation regarding screening for asymptomatic vitamin D deficiency in 2014. 8 Additionally, the USPSTF has published separate recommendations on the use of vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of falls or fractures and for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. 9-11 Importantly, the current recommendations for screening for vitamin D deficiency in community-dwelling, nonpregnant, asymptomatic adults do not apply to individuals who are hospitalized or institutionalized or to those who have underlying conditions (eg, osteoporosis, osteomalacia, malabsorption, or chronic kidney disease) or take medications that increase the risk of vitamin D deficiency. In addition, the USPSTF did not review emerging evidence on COVID-19 and vitamin D, although a recent randomized clinical trial suggested that a single dose of vitamin D did not reduce hospital length of stay in 240 adults with moderate to severe COVID-19. 12 The current USPSTF report does not include studies directly evaluating the benefits or harms of screening for vitamin D deficiency because none were identified. However, the evidence review did identify and evaluate 26 randomized clinical trials and 1 nested case-control study that reported data on the effectiveness of treatment of vitamin D deficiency (10 new studies and 17 studies from the 2014 USPSTF report) and 36 placebo-controlled studies reporting adverse events and harms from treatment with vitamin D (17 new studies and 19 studies