2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2010.01201.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin D production depends on ultraviolet-B dose but not on dose rate: A randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
57
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(66 reference statements)
7
57
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…redness, and pigment protection factor (ratio of SED to minimal erythmal dose) (20). Our longer-term, free-living data support that there is no difference in mean 25(OH)D change between self-reported skin types I-III, although the latter had greater sunlight exposure in summer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…redness, and pigment protection factor (ratio of SED to minimal erythmal dose) (20). Our longer-term, free-living data support that there is no difference in mean 25(OH)D change between self-reported skin types I-III, although the latter had greater sunlight exposure in summer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Thus, if there were a photodegradation process instigated by UVA, 1 min is probably not long enough to initiate the degradation of Tables 3 and 4. We found that Δ25(OH)D was positively correlated to a low baseline value of 25(OH)D. Consequently, the increase of 25(OH)D was largest in the participants with the lowest baseline values, an observation reported previously (6,16,17). However, such a significant relationship could depend on the regression to the mean phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…4,11,17 We did not find any correlation between the cumulative dose of UVBnb and the increase of serum 25(OH)D at 12 weeks, in accordance with Osmancevic et al 14 but in contradiction to a recent study. 18 The explanation might be that 25(OH)D reaches a plateau after 3 weeks already, and that exposure to additional UVBnb may not result in a continued proportional increase in serum vitamin D. UVBnb therapies but significant only under UVBbb therapy. 8,12,14 However we cannot exclude a significant PTH decrease with a greater patient number, as we observe a tendency towards a reduction of plasmatic PTH.…”
Section: -15mentioning
confidence: 99%