2017
DOI: 10.1016/bs.acc.2016.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin D Testing—Where Are We and What Is on the Horizon?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Free or unbound concentrations (C f ) of vitamin D 3 in serum were quantified by ELISA (Free 25OH Vitamin D ELISA; Future Diagnostic Solutions; DIAsource ImmunoAssays®; Belgium) https://www.alpco.com/pdfs/38/38-KARF1991.pdf 26,27 . Total serum concentrations (C tot ) of vitamin D 3 , which is the sum of C f + the concentration bound to serum proteins (C b ), were quantified using the DiaSorin LIAISON vitamin D assay as previously described 25 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Free or unbound concentrations (C f ) of vitamin D 3 in serum were quantified by ELISA (Free 25OH Vitamin D ELISA; Future Diagnostic Solutions; DIAsource ImmunoAssays®; Belgium) https://www.alpco.com/pdfs/38/38-KARF1991.pdf 26,27 . Total serum concentrations (C tot ) of vitamin D 3 , which is the sum of C f + the concentration bound to serum proteins (C b ), were quantified using the DiaSorin LIAISON vitamin D assay as previously described 25 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, free 25-OHD could be considered as an independent prognostic biomarker for survival. More recently, many other articles have been published, including reviews and clinical studies, which highlight the importance of free 25-OHD 27 .…”
Section: -Ohd Free In Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When turnaround times should be minimal the use of automated readily available methods of 25(OH)D testing is certainly preferable to the time-consuming method of LC-MS/MS in clinical routine [13,14]. International standardization of current 25(OH)D immunoassays has reduced previously reported interlaboratory variation [15,16]; however, differences seem to be more prominent in specific populations, such as hemodialysis patients, critically ill individuals or pregnant women [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%