2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02280.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamins C and E for the prevention of pre‐eclampsia: time to give up the ghost*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Millions of US dollars and research resources have passed since the Cochrane review [112] detailed that there was no significant difference between antioxidant and control groups for the relative risk of preeclampsia or any other analysed outcome thirteen years ago. Thus, Talaulikar and Manyonda [113] were arguably right when they suggested that it was time to "give up the ghost" on antioxidants for preeclampsia treatment/prevention twelve years ago. What is more surprising is that even though antioxidant treatment for preeclampsia has clearly failed, future trials involving antioxidant treatment (among other drugs) in complicated pregnancies are planned and several are expected to be completed in subsequent years (see Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Millions of US dollars and research resources have passed since the Cochrane review [112] detailed that there was no significant difference between antioxidant and control groups for the relative risk of preeclampsia or any other analysed outcome thirteen years ago. Thus, Talaulikar and Manyonda [113] were arguably right when they suggested that it was time to "give up the ghost" on antioxidants for preeclampsia treatment/prevention twelve years ago. What is more surprising is that even though antioxidant treatment for preeclampsia has clearly failed, future trials involving antioxidant treatment (among other drugs) in complicated pregnancies are planned and several are expected to be completed in subsequent years (see Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%