2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-018-0194-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitrectomy with scleral buckling versus with inferior retinectomy in treating primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with PVR and inferior breaks

Abstract: Similar anatomical and functional outcomes were achieved by combining PPV with scleral buckle or inferior retinectomy for treatment of primary RRD with PVR and inferior breaks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the reasons for a lower success rate in these cases is the lack of inferior retinal support with the traditional endotamponade agents, including sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), octafluoropropane (C3F8), or silicone oil, which require more challenging patient posturing after surgery. 1,2 Other surgical approaches for inferior detachments include scleral buckle, combined vitrectomy and scleral buckle, and inferior retinectomy with or without the use of silicone oil. 3 Heavy silicone oils (HSOs), and specifically Densiron 68 (FLUORON GmbH, Neu-Ulm, Germany) with a density of 1.06 g/cm 3 and a viscosity of 1,400 mPas, provide support to the inferior retina and may serve as a good alternative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons for a lower success rate in these cases is the lack of inferior retinal support with the traditional endotamponade agents, including sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), octafluoropropane (C3F8), or silicone oil, which require more challenging patient posturing after surgery. 1,2 Other surgical approaches for inferior detachments include scleral buckle, combined vitrectomy and scleral buckle, and inferior retinectomy with or without the use of silicone oil. 3 Heavy silicone oils (HSOs), and specifically Densiron 68 (FLUORON GmbH, Neu-Ulm, Germany) with a density of 1.06 g/cm 3 and a viscosity of 1,400 mPas, provide support to the inferior retina and may serve as a good alternative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Ghoraba et al [37] have demonstrated that the use of ESB in combination with PPV and SO offered no additional effect on either the anatomical success or the rate of macular hole closure in the management of myopic macular hole RD. Eleinen et al [38] described similar anatomical and functional outcomes by combining PPV with ESB or inferior retinectomy for the treatment of primary RRD with PVR and inferior breaks. A recent study by Rossi et al [39] using an elegant in vivo model has demonstrated that 360° scleral indentation did not improve SO-retinal contact and that it promotes a significant shear stress increase at the indentation site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, geometric changes more than contact variation may influence clinical success rate, as scleral indentation undoubtedly contrasts with retinal shortening 18 and, indirectly, PVR development. 19 , 20 Head positioning is also considered, with the aim of improving SiO–retinal contact, at least in some sectors, but it remains a matter of debate because of the intrinsic difficulty of maintaining the prescribed posture, the uncertain benefits, 21 dubious compliance, and possible drawbacks. 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%