Objective:
This study aimed to determine the intravitreal concentration of VEGF in eyes with PDR and to evaluate the effects of previous PRP on its level.
Methods:
It was a cross-sectional study performed at the Clinical Centre University. It included 90 eyes surgically treated with PPV, divided into three groups, group A - patients with PDR with previous PRP, group B - patients with PDR without previous PRP, and group C - PPV performed due to the indication unrelated to diabetes. A vitreous sample was obtained during PPV, and the VEGF concentration was determined using an Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test (ELISA). Shapiro-Wilk, nonparametric tests Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whithney U test, ANOVA and Spearman’s correlation test were used.
Results:
The highest vitreous VEGF concentration was in group B - 972.96 (743.33-1149.13) and was higher than in group A - 69.22 (37.33-225.15) and in group C - 19.93 (1.15-32.17) (p<0.001). There was a positive correlation between VEGF vitreous concentration and glucose level in group A patients (Rho=0.410; p=0.027).
Conclusion:
As a treatment before PPV surgery, PRP showed to be effective in the reduction of VEGF levels, which also highlighted a decrease in complications during and postoperatively.
Abbreviations:
DRS = Diabetic Retinopathy Study, PDR = proliferative diabetic retinopathy, VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor, PRP = pan-retinal photocoagulation, PPV = pars plana vitrectomy, HbA1c = glycosylated hemoglobin, ETDRS = Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study, ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate, BCVA = best corrected visual acuity, OCT = optical coherent tomography, ILM = internal limiting membrane, PHACO = phacoemulsification, IOL = intraocular lens, ELISA = Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test, AUC = area under the curve, DME = diabetic macular oedema, TDR = tractional retinal detachment, VMT = vitreomacular traction