2013
DOI: 10.1051/proc/201343003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vlasov on GPU (VOG project)

Abstract: Résumé. Ce travail concerne la simulation numérique du modèle de Vlasov-Poissonà l'aide de méthodes semi-Lagrangiennes, sur des architectures GPU. Pour cela, quelques modifications de la méthode traditionnelle ont dûêtre effectuées. Tout d'abord, une reformulation des méthodes semiLagrangiennes est proposée, qui permet de la réécrire sous la forme d'un produit d'une matrice circulante avec le vecteur des inconnues. Ce calcul peutêtre fait efficacement grâce aux routines de FFT. Actuellement, le GPU n'est plus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, obtaining a performant implementation in this setting is very difficult. All approaches to parallelize Eulerian and semi-Lagrangian methods on GPUs have thus focused on different algorithms [25,8,4,30].…”
Section: Description Of the Algorithm And Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, obtaining a performant implementation in this setting is very difficult. All approaches to parallelize Eulerian and semi-Lagrangian methods on GPUs have thus focused on different algorithms [25,8,4,30].…”
Section: Description Of the Algorithm And Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of that method is that there is no memory overhead as compared to a finite difference implementation. (Note that the method under consideration in this paper stores the coefficients of the Legendre polynomials up to order which leads to an increased memory consumption but is expected to result in a scheme that is less dissipative; see, e.g., [20].) In the mentioned paper a numerical study of the Van Leer scheme is conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P1 which is the least costly method is also clearly the fastest method. We obtain around 1GFlops (when the efficiency is about 30) which is a correct value with respect to [27] for example. It is followed by the Z9 element, and the Mitchell elements which need also the computation of the mixed derivatives.…”
Section: Circular Advectionmentioning
confidence: 69%