2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vlax Roma history: what do coalescent-based methods tell us?

Abstract: Three coalescent-based methods allowed us to infer some aspects of the history of three Bulgarian Gypsies populations belonging to the Vlax linguistic group: the Lom, Rudari and Kalderas. We used several kinds of genetic markers: HV1 sequences of the maternally inherited mitochondrial genome and microsatellites of the paternally inherited Y chromosome and of the biparentally inherited chromosome 8. This allowed us to infer several parameters for men and women: the splitting order of the populations and the age… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A clear difference, however, was present in the Vlax-Roma, gypsies living in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Romania, Albania, and Hungary (30), in which a small number of individuals were heterozygous for this polymorphism. The Vlax-Roma account for a substantial proportion of the overall Romani population (11). The Roma population is an Eastern Indo-European population that, after splitting from the Western Indo-Europeans, established themselves in North India (26,41) before migrating into Europe relatively late (900 to 1,100 years ago) (19,42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clear difference, however, was present in the Vlax-Roma, gypsies living in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Romania, Albania, and Hungary (30), in which a small number of individuals were heterozygous for this polymorphism. The Vlax-Roma account for a substantial proportion of the overall Romani population (11). The Roma population is an Eastern Indo-European population that, after splitting from the Western Indo-Europeans, established themselves in North India (26,41) before migrating into Europe relatively late (900 to 1,100 years ago) (19,42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morar et al (2004) estimated the coalescent time in the entire Roma population for the mutation causing HMSNL to be *850 years. This means that it predates the split of the Vlax Roma to numerous subgroups, which is dated to *500 years (Kalaydjieva et al, 2001a;Chaix et al, 2004). The age and distribution of the mutation in most Roma groups implies its existence in the proto-Roma population, and we can assume that the mutation detected in the Croatian Bayash Roma founder population represents a genetic legacy of this original proto-Roma group.…”
Section: Bareš Ić and Perič Ić Salihovićmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For GM1, carrier rates are for the general Roma population and Rudari subisolate in the Vlax migration category (Sinigerska et al, 2006). introduced through intermarriage with Bayash Roma from Serbia (Chaix et al, 2004), where it was also noted (Dačković et al, 2008), and that the Croatian Bayash founder population originally did not have it. This could also explain the difference in carrier rates between the MeCimurje and Baranja Bayash Roma populations.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within these autochthonous European populations, there was only one significant pairwise F st value (Budapest to France, F st =0.004, p=0.04), whose significance is eliminated with the application of the Bonferroni correction. Despite the distinctiveness of the Romani populations at the level of haplogroup representation, consistent with a common ancestry, there are clearly factors that restrict matrilineal gene flow among various Romani groups, even those within close geographical proximity (see also [7,8,38]). The Budapest sample, on the other hand, is quite similar to other autochthonous European samples and there appears to be no basis for treating the Budapest population sample separately from other combined European databases for the purposes of forensic comparisons.…”
Section: Population Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%