2014
DOI: 10.4304/jltr.5.3.487-497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vocabulary in CLIL and in Mainstream Education

Abstract: Abstract-The focus of the study reported in this article was vocabulary size attained in two learning environments, i.e. in regular mainstream instruction and in CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning). Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of sixth-graders from both environments were compared with the respective vocabulary sizes of corresponding ninth-graders using the Vocabulary Levels Test and the Productive Vocabulary Levels Test. It was hypothesized that CLIL would produce larger vocabularies,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 10000 word level contains low-frequency items. L2 learners within 10000 word level can be considered proficient as he can read practically any texts, apart fromspecialized materials, without major difficulty (Merikivi and Pietilä, 2014). Finally, the academic word level is based on Coxhead's (2000) Academic Word List.…”
Section: The Vocabulary Levels Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 10000 word level contains low-frequency items. L2 learners within 10000 word level can be considered proficient as he can read practically any texts, apart fromspecialized materials, without major difficulty (Merikivi and Pietilä, 2014). Finally, the academic word level is based on Coxhead's (2000) Academic Word List.…”
Section: The Vocabulary Levels Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li and MacGregor (2010) measured the English receptive vocabulary size of Chinese university students and found that students had mastered the higher frequency words (2,000 and 3,000), but not the lower frequency words (5,000). Also, Merikivi and Pietilä (2014) in a study of 330 Finnish schools students found that students' passive vocabulary knowledge decreased systematically as word frequency decreased.…”
Section: Word Family Frequency Listsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A similar research design was used in Finland by Merikivi and Pietilä (2014) to compare CLIL ( n = 75) and non-CLIL ( n = 74) sixth graders’ (age 13) English vocabulary. In this context, CLIL instruction was not preceded by or complemented by EFL learning.…”
Section: Assessment Of Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To summarize, out of the six studies on content-based programs (Table 4), three small-scale studies aimed to measure and compare YLs’ English vocabulary in CLIL and non-CLIL groups in Spain (Agustín Llach, 2015; Agustín Llach & Canga Alonso, 2016) and in Finland (Merikivi & Pietilä, 2014), whereas another project on Spanish YLs (Tragant et al, 2016) collected data with multiple instruments and analyzed both EFL and Science coursebooks as well as classroom observation data. Two large-scale studies implemented in Spain and Hungary assessed multiple L2 skills (Nikolov & Szabó, 2015; de Diezmas, 2016).…”
Section: Assessment Of Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%