2013
DOI: 10.1655/herpetologica-d-11-00042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vocal Behavior of the Ponmudi Bush Frog (Raorchestes graminirupes): Repertoire and Individual Variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we did not detect within-individual variation in the dominant frequency analysed for both the advertisement and aggressive calls throughout the night. The lack of variation in the dominant frequency can be explained because this parameter is usually correlated with morphological traits, mainly male size, which is stable over time (Morais et al 2012;Bee et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, we did not detect within-individual variation in the dominant frequency analysed for both the advertisement and aggressive calls throughout the night. The lack of variation in the dominant frequency can be explained because this parameter is usually correlated with morphological traits, mainly male size, which is stable over time (Morais et al 2012;Bee et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the within-individual variation and social context, anuran acoustic parameters can also be influenced by environmental variables and/or be limited by male morphological traits (e.g. Lemes et al 2012;Morais et al 2012;Bee et al 2013). The dominant frequency of the calls is usually correlated with male size, while temporal parameters are more influenced by air temperature (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used Raven Pro 1.4 (Charif, Waack & Strickman, 2010) Manuscript to be reviewed properties is provided in Table S1A. Properties are analyzed after Bee et al (2013a;2013b).…”
Section: Call Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Call variation within and between individuals of many anurans is influenced by individual motivation of the vocalizing male owing to numerous internal and/or external factors (Wells, 2007;Köhler et al, 2017). For example, social context could change the frequency of calls (Bee, Perrill & Owen, 2000;Reichert & Gerhardt, 2013) and temperature effects are linked to pulse rate and call duration (CD) (Lingnau & Bastos, 2007;Pröhl et al, 2007;Gasser, Amézquita & Hödl, 2009;Bee, Suyesh & Biju, 2013;Ziegler, Arim & Bozinovic, 2015) at the individual level. Furthermore, body size could constrain the frequency of calls (Gerhardt & Huber, 2002;Gingras et al, 2013) and physical or physiological damages could generate differences in calls (Hoffmann & Kloas, 2012;Pröhl et al, 2013) among individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%