2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10919-017-0250-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vocal Cues Underlying Youth and Adult Portrayals of Socio-emotional Expressions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed female advantage for emotional categorization echoes numerous studies in adults and children focusing on different channels of emotion communication, including faces 7 , 52 , 53 , 69 – 71 , body movements 72 , 73 , voice and prosody 49 , 74 76 . Although robust in meta-analyses 20 , 21 , this effect is small and not always apparent in individual studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The observed female advantage for emotional categorization echoes numerous studies in adults and children focusing on different channels of emotion communication, including faces 7 , 52 , 53 , 69 – 71 , body movements 72 , 73 , voice and prosody 49 , 74 76 . Although robust in meta-analyses 20 , 21 , this effect is small and not always apparent in individual studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Audio stimuli were selected from a set of recordings produced by three 13-year-old community-based actors (2 females), generated with the aid of emotional vignettes (Morningstar, Dirks, & Huang, 2017). Actors spoke the same five sentences (e.g., "Why did you do that?…”
Section: Stimuli and Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, it is possible that youth show less functional specialization in the processing of different vocal emotion patterns than would adults; though this hypothesis is strictly speculative, it would be in line with theoretical predictions of the Interactive Specialization model (Johnson et al, 2009) and previous findings regarding the development of nonemotional voice processing in the superior temporal cortex (Bonte et al, 2013;Bonte et al, 2016). Yet another possibility is that youth-produced vocal emotions, which have been found to be less distinct from one another in pitch (Morningstar et al, 2017), may not elicit as strong emotionspecific responses in the brain as would adult-produced stimuli. Future work should investigate whether emotion-specific responses to affective prosody vary depending on factors such as the age of the listener or speaker.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, it is crucial for youth to be able to parse these cues accurately. Additionally, meanness and friendliness have been shown to be acoustically distinct from emotions like anger and happiness (Morningstar, Huang, & Dirks, 2017;Noble & Xu, 2011), and there is evidence that social expressions are processed differently than basic emotions at a neural level (e.g., Adolphs, Baron-Cohen, & Tranel, 2002). Including meanness and friendliness in our stimulus set thus allowed for a deeper understanding of youth's interpretation of socially relevant affective cues.…”
Section: Goals and Hypotheses Of The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%