2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11930-018-0179-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vocal Signals of Sexual Motivation in Male and Female Rodents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Singing mice also exhibit dynamic “turn-taking” counter-singing behavior, rapidly modifying the starts and stops of songs during social interactions (Okobi et al, 2019). Similar relationships between vocal effort and social experience are well documented in other taxa, particularly in avian (Catchpole and Slater, 2008; Podos and Cohn-Haft, 2019) and anuran species (Bernal et al, 2009; Gerhardt, 1991; Ryan, 1985), in wild muroid rodents (Fernández-Vargas, 2018 a; Fernández-Vargas, 2018 b), and in other mammals (Briefer, 2012; Gouzoules and Gouzoules, 2000), including humans (Bachorowski, 1999). Male music frogs dynamically adjust calling efforts based on perceived sexual attractiveness of rivals (Fang et al, 2014), comparable to male responses to competition in gray treefrogs (Gerhardt, 1991) and túngara frogs (Bernal et al, 2009; Ryan, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Singing mice also exhibit dynamic “turn-taking” counter-singing behavior, rapidly modifying the starts and stops of songs during social interactions (Okobi et al, 2019). Similar relationships between vocal effort and social experience are well documented in other taxa, particularly in avian (Catchpole and Slater, 2008; Podos and Cohn-Haft, 2019) and anuran species (Bernal et al, 2009; Gerhardt, 1991; Ryan, 1985), in wild muroid rodents (Fernández-Vargas, 2018 a; Fernández-Vargas, 2018 b), and in other mammals (Briefer, 2012; Gouzoules and Gouzoules, 2000), including humans (Bachorowski, 1999). Male music frogs dynamically adjust calling efforts based on perceived sexual attractiveness of rivals (Fang et al, 2014), comparable to male responses to competition in gray treefrogs (Gerhardt, 1991) and túngara frogs (Bernal et al, 2009; Ryan, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The recognition mechanisms involved here are still unclear, but mice can discriminate kinship through odor cues [32]. If USV emission provides an index of a male's sexual arousal, as often proposed [13], then our findings suggest that male mice show mating preferences for non-kin over kin potentially to avoid inbreeding. Females have been shown to recognize siblings by their USVs, as they are more attracted to playbacks of USVs from non-siblings than siblings [17], however, we cannot rule out the possibility that females might be more attracted to unrelated males due to odor or their enhanced sexual arousal.…”
Section: Genetic Relatedness and Usv Emissionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Our results could be due to male preferences, female preferences, or both. Male USV emission appears to signal sexual arousal [13], and males might be more attracted to unrelated than related females. Females might be more attracted to these calls and mate faster with males that are more sexually aroused.…”
Section: Usv Emission and Reproductive Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, we only examined the effects of previous experience of female interactions on male USVs, and future studies are needed to investigate same-versus oppositesex priming on both sexes to determine whether such effects are sexual, social, or both (sociosexual). It is unclear how sexual experience induces changes in male vocalizations, but some potential neuro-endocrine mechanisms have been identified [see 39,45,[71][72][73]. Sexual stimuli trigger a surge of androgens, which regulate male USV emission and other sexual behaviours [74][75][76][77][78][79].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%