2011
DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vocational Choice and Attitudes toward Welfare Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This unambiguous support for an activist welfare state runs counter to the neo-liberal discourse that has prevailed among economic decision makers and high-level bureaucrats in Israel in the last decades (Dery & Sharon, 1994; Doron, 2007) and permeated into Knesset discussions. It is consistent, however, with the pro-welfare attitudes found among Israeli social workers and social work students (Guy, 2011; Makaros & Weiss-Gal, 2014). It is also consistent with the activism demonstrated by individual social workers and groups they formed to oppose cutbacks in social welfare provision and the privatization of social services (Levin, 2012; Yonah & Spivak, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This unambiguous support for an activist welfare state runs counter to the neo-liberal discourse that has prevailed among economic decision makers and high-level bureaucrats in Israel in the last decades (Dery & Sharon, 1994; Doron, 2007) and permeated into Knesset discussions. It is consistent, however, with the pro-welfare attitudes found among Israeli social workers and social work students (Guy, 2011; Makaros & Weiss-Gal, 2014). It is also consistent with the activism demonstrated by individual social workers and groups they formed to oppose cutbacks in social welfare provision and the privatization of social services (Levin, 2012; Yonah & Spivak, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It is consistent, however, with the prowelfare attitudes found among Israeli social workers and social work students (Guy, 2011;Makaros & Weiss-Gal, 2014). It is also consistent with the activism demonstrated by individual social workers and groups they formed to oppose cutbacks in social welfare provision and the privatization of social services (Levin, 2012;Yonah & Spivak, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…We reasoned that communicating a value-identity fitting message should appeal to, or resonate with, those in the group who already share the movement's ideological background (Gamson, 1992;Klandermans, 1997). However, communicating the very same message to those in the group with a different ideological background (Guy, 2011;Pratto, Sidanius, Stallworth, & Malle, 1994) would actually be more likely to be a misfit, which might backfire or at least fail to motivate individuals to engage in collective action.…”
Section: Subproject 3: the Dutch Student Movement Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then proceeded to identify the ideologically different subgroups. Our strategy was to compare students groups based on their study background, 5 as previous research had found ideological differences among students depending on their majors (Guy, 2011). Due to relatively small sample size and no effects of the manipulation, we calculated the mean scores on all variables 2 One person did not indicate age or gender.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%