2004
DOI: 10.1163/1568539041166726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice Breaking in Males Results in Sexual Dimorphism of Green Woodhoopoe Calls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In chicks of the Green Woodhoopoe "kek" calls were indistinguishable between sexes and only at the age of 3-5 months did the fundamental frequency of young males become twice as low as that of females (Radford 2004). Similarly, chick calls of American Coots were indistinguishable between sexes up to the age of 2-3 months, when female fundamental frequency decreased more than twice their original (Cosens 1981).…”
Section: Sexing Chicks By Voicementioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In chicks of the Green Woodhoopoe "kek" calls were indistinguishable between sexes and only at the age of 3-5 months did the fundamental frequency of young males become twice as low as that of females (Radford 2004). Similarly, chick calls of American Coots were indistinguishable between sexes up to the age of 2-3 months, when female fundamental frequency decreased more than twice their original (Cosens 1981).…”
Section: Sexing Chicks By Voicementioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the Green Woodhoopoe (Phoeniculus purpureus), "kek" calls were twice as low in fundamental frequency in males as in females (Radford 2004). The values of fundamental frequency did not overlap between sexes; these were lower than 600 Hz in males and higher than 700 Hz in females, which ensured 100 % reliable sexing.…”
Section: Order Coraciiformesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Fourth, how do group members of different sex and dominance status adjust their allopreening following intergroup conflict? Males and females are predicted to show similar changes in allopreening because they contribute equally to intergroup conflicts (Radford 2003); the dominant breeding pair and subordinate non-breeding helpers may increase their allopreening to different extents because the latter expend more effort in intergroup conflicts (Radford 2003 (Radford & du Plessis 2003) and vocalizations (Radford 2004b). Dominance status can be established during foraging, when the members of the putative breeding pair displace samesex helpers (Radford & du Plessis 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) or fatigue (Vannoni & McElligott ). Voice ‘breaking’ has been noted in several species of birds, and it is possible that the vocal shifts observed in the atonal chatter may correspond to the ageing of the birds (Radford ; Klenova et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%