2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice characteristics before versus after mandibular setback surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism using nonlinear dynamics and conventional acoustic analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a different trend was observed in other studies, since the authors found no significant differences in the means of f0 between men with class III malocclusion before orthognathic surgery compared to controls [8] and between individuals with class III malocclusion and normal individuals [2]. The second study did not assess specific vowels and only considered means of spontaneous speech segments, which may account for such findings [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, a different trend was observed in other studies, since the authors found no significant differences in the means of f0 between men with class III malocclusion before orthognathic surgery compared to controls [8] and between individuals with class III malocclusion and normal individuals [2]. The second study did not assess specific vowels and only considered means of spontaneous speech segments, which may account for such findings [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It may have been influenced by the anatomical characteristics themselves, such as the larger protruding jaw [16]. However, another study observed lower values of F1 and F2 only in the vowel [a] in men with class III in relation to their controls, which demonstrates elevation and posteriorization of the tongue [8]. This punctual difference, with opposite tendency to other researches may probably be related to muscular adjustments during the speech production performed by these individuals [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Niemi et al, compensatory movements of the tongue and mandible enabling normal incisor relations could occur in patients with class II malocclusion, and no significant changes in pronunciation were observed after mandibular advancement. However, this outcome may not be relevant to patients with class III malocclusion, and only a few studies of the structural changes in pronunciation and articulation after a mandibular setback have been conducted, there is no consensus on the effects of mandibular setback on the speech and voice (Fairbanks and Lintner, 1951;Hassan et al, 2007;Mishima et al, 2013). According to the author's previous study, patients with Angle's class III malocclusion showed a larger aperture for low vowels and a forwarding of the back vowels compared with occlusion patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shaping of the vocal tract using the lips, tongue, jaw, and velum for speech output is called articulation; the lips, tongue, jaws, and velum are the articulators. [1][2][3][4] Assuming normal orofacial structures, individuals typically acquire the appropriate shaping of the vocal tract for the sounds of their language according to common developmental patterns entitled phonological development. 1,4,5 The consonants produced in any language can be described by their distinctive features as follows: 1) the place of production; 2) the degree of constriction between the two articulators; 3) the path of emission or energy enhancement, via the mouth versus the nose; and 4) the voicing, whether or not the vocal folds are in vibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%