2020
DOI: 10.3390/jmse8030197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice Communication Systems Impact on Navigating Officers

Abstract: The tasks of an officer of the watch (OOW) on complex ships during navigation in coastal areas may be very challenging. Almost all the tasks require substantial information processing and timely decision making. Every distracting element should be avoided during navigation. Every call, made through any communication system, activates a new process that the OOW needs to conduct. The new process may interrupt a previously started task. In case of too many incoming calls, the workload of the OOW may increase sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, the UK's Maritime and Coastguard Agency [45] recognises Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) equipment, completion of administrative tasks [47] on bridge and routine testing of bridge equipment as 'distractions' to the watchkeeping officers' primary duty of keeping a proper lookout. However, no one appears to propose a solution to overcome them albeit recognising that these distractions potentially lead to low levels of SA [42]. This is where the solutions presented in this paper are not only relevant but fill in a long standing, vital, yet fundamental gap in maritime watchkeepers' skills.…”
Section: Situational Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, the UK's Maritime and Coastguard Agency [45] recognises Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) equipment, completion of administrative tasks [47] on bridge and routine testing of bridge equipment as 'distractions' to the watchkeeping officers' primary duty of keeping a proper lookout. However, no one appears to propose a solution to overcome them albeit recognising that these distractions potentially lead to low levels of SA [42]. This is where the solutions presented in this paper are not only relevant but fill in a long standing, vital, yet fundamental gap in maritime watchkeepers' skills.…”
Section: Situational Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Each navigational task [42] performed by a watchkeeper requires substantial multiple sources of information to be processed. Based upon an individual's cognitive ability, they can probably choose the source of this information but if overwhelmed by the visual or audible information stimuli, the decision-making is almost always likely to be affected [8], leading possibly to human error.…”
Section: Visual Searching and Distractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting observation is the gap of the BVP pulse shortly after the initiation of the disturbance factor. The gap indicates an expectation due to real-life experience that the alarm is not essential [24] and will be silenced shortly, or that the participant's working memory dismissing this sound as likely a false alarm [25]. That is not the same as ignoring an alarm but is yet another variable that likely, at times, affects the behavior of people in perilous situations.…”
Section: Post Processing and Data Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a high workload is caused by various disturbing factors that divert an officer’s attention. Typical disturbing factors during navigation are bridge alarms and various calls and e-mails, which affect the navigator’s situational awareness [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. The density of the disturbing factors (in each time window) increases the cognitive load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%