2000
DOI: 10.1006/jpho.2000.0113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice-onset times for Castilian Spanish initial stops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
35
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
7
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are substantially higher than those reported for Castilian Spanish: 12ms /p/, 14ms /t/ and 26.5ms /k/ (Rosner et al 2000), as well as the value of 25.5ms reported for /k/ for female speakers from Central Mexico (Carpenter 2012). A comparison of YS mean VOTs and those reported in previous studies for other regions is found in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These values are substantially higher than those reported for Castilian Spanish: 12ms /p/, 14ms /t/ and 26.5ms /k/ (Rosner et al 2000), as well as the value of 25.5ms reported for /k/ for female speakers from Central Mexico (Carpenter 2012). A comparison of YS mean VOTs and those reported in previous studies for other regions is found in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…The limitations of the study were recognized, however, noting that there could be dialectal differences in alternate dialects or if stops were examined in other contexts such as running speech or word-medially (Williams 1977). More recently, Rosner et al (2000) replicated the experiments of Williams (1977) and Castañeda (1986) in order to make a quantitative comparison of Castilian and Latin American Spanish. Significant differences between dialects were found and confirmed when submitted to statistical analysis (see Figure 1 in Section 4 for a comparison).…”
Section: Vot Across Spanish Dialects and In Yucatan Spanishmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results may be ambiguous or distorted if we try to compare VOT values variance of two languages according to the following vowel. For example, the postconsonantal vowel was / c / rather than /2/ when Castilian Spanish speakers began voicing later for /p/, /k/ and started it earlier for /b/, /g/ (Rosner et al, 2000). We have made the comparison of VOT values variance according to the vowel only in our controlled environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For two Puerto Rican Spanish speakers the VOT values of voiceless stops /p/, /t/, /k/ were 4, 9, and 29 ms, respectively whereas the voiced stops /b/, /d/, /g/ were À138, À110, and À108 ms, respectively (Lisker and Abramson, 1964). The measurements were done on oscillograms for thirty-two Castilian Spanish speakers and the VOT values of /p/, /t/, /k/, /b/, /d/, /g/ were found to be 13.1, 14, 26.5, À91.5, À91.6, À73.7 ms, respectively (Rosner et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%