2013
DOI: 10.1002/lary.23785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice outcomes following reconstruction of laryngopharyngectomy defects using the radial forearm free flap and the anterolateral thigh free flap

Abstract: 2b.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Demographic features of the three study groups were essentially equivalent. Although comparison of the objective acoustic parameters of intensity and fundamental frequency is absent in many recent studies, our analysis concurred with older works demonstrating no significant differences between the three groups, thereby countering the frequently held belief that TLP patients with flap reconstruction have “low” voices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Demographic features of the three study groups were essentially equivalent. Although comparison of the objective acoustic parameters of intensity and fundamental frequency is absent in many recent studies, our analysis concurred with older works demonstrating no significant differences between the three groups, thereby countering the frequently held belief that TLP patients with flap reconstruction have “low” voices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As noted, the ALT flap has recently gained popularity as another fasciocutaneous free flap option for the TLP defect . Having similar tissue characteristics to the RFF, ALT patients might be expected to demonstrate similar vocal function, as noted by Revenuagh, under this study protocol. Yet, direct comparison would offer the best insight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measuring the defect is difficult before or after the resection and does not take account of quality and elasticity of the mucosa. In the largest and dominant studies on this topic, reported methods and criteria assessing for a possible primary closure of the mucosa were: none, 10,12,16,19,20 size of inset flap or estimated defect, 13,21 and predicted size after closure permitting an index finger in the lumen. 22 Therefore, we conclude that, currently, a reproducible and unbiased method for selecting the type of pharynx reconstruction (primary closure, pedicled flap, or free flap) does not exist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inevitably, large defects after surgery will lead to severe voice handicap and swallowing disability. Thus, tissue grafts like a jejunal flap, supraclavicular artery flap, and anterolateral thigh flap are commonly used for surgical repair [ 3 8 ]. This will induce tissue defects at other sites and double harms for patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%