2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice Quality in Telephone Interviews: A preliminary Acoustic Investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others discovered that AVQI measures obtained from smartphone microphone voice recordings with experimentally added ambient noise disclosed an amicable settlement with the results of oral microphone recordings, implying that smartphone microphone recordings conducted, even with the existence of acceptable ambient noise, are suitable for estimating AVQI [13]. Pommes wanted to see how standardized mobile phone recordings transferred across a telecom channel affected acoustic indicators of speech quality and how voice specialists perceived it in normophonic speakers [14]. The results reveal that sending a speech signal across a telephone line causes filtering and noise effects, limiting the use of popular acoustic sound quality metrics and indexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others discovered that AVQI measures obtained from smartphone microphone voice recordings with experimentally added ambient noise disclosed an amicable settlement with the results of oral microphone recordings, implying that smartphone microphone recordings conducted, even with the existence of acceptable ambient noise, are suitable for estimating AVQI [13]. Pommes wanted to see how standardized mobile phone recordings transferred across a telecom channel affected acoustic indicators of speech quality and how voice specialists perceived it in normophonic speakers [14]. The results reveal that sending a speech signal across a telephone line causes filtering and noise effects, limiting the use of popular acoustic sound quality metrics and indexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent studies found that none of the studied smartphones could replace the professional microphone in a voice recording to evaluate the six parameters analyzed, except for f 0 and jitter. Moreover, passing a voice signal through a telecom channel induced both filter and noise effects which significantly impacted common acoustic voice quality measures [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%